Fermat's Polygonal Number theorem vs FLT?
in [Math]
|
Prev: If - this statement is used to open an exact proof p = np, if this is true or false, do this.
Next: Looking for: Functional Equation
From: Tonico on 7 May 2010 17:44 On May 8, 12:32 am, fernando revilla <frej0...(a)ficus.pntic.mec.es> wrote: > Hope this helps: > > Let P_s be a determined mathematical proposal based on > a false statement s. Prove that: > > (a) P_s has no sense. > (b) P_{¬ s} has sense or not depending on the relations of > ¬ s with the complement of ¬ s relative to P_{¬ s} > > ---http://ficus.pntic.mec.es/~frej0002/ You are, apparently, addressing my past post, so I can say: I don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about...not even what you hope the above can help to. Tonio
From: fernando revilla on 7 May 2010 14:17 The class is over. Good luck. --- http://ficus.pntic.mec.es/~frej0002/
From: Arturo Magidin on 7 May 2010 21:57 On May 7, 3:15 pm, fernando revilla <frej0...(a)ficus.pntic.mec.es> wrote: > Jesse F. Hughes wrote: > > I honestly have no idea how you come to this > > conclusion. Perhaps you > > could point me to a post where he stated or implied > > this? I might > > have missed it. > > For example: > > http://mathforum.org/kb/message.jspa?messageID=7059182&tstart=0 Aha. It would appear that he is running afoul of Mathforum, and this is the result of a miscommunication because he believes he fixed the misstatement, and does not realize that people who are not reading his message through Mathforum *are not seeing the correction*. Yet another case of someone thinking that everyone is reading this forum using the exact same interface they are... But that certainly clears this up. He made a mistake, believed he had corrected it, and so thought that people who kept bringing up the mistake were not playing fair. The rest of us, who only saw the mistake and saw him claiming he had made none, kept bringing it up, and found his replies evasive or insulting, since the mistake was *clearly there* to us. -- Arturo Magidin
From: Arturo Magidin on 7 May 2010 21:59 On May 7, 5:17 pm, fernando revilla <frej0...(a)ficus.pntic.mec.es> wrote: > The class is over. Good luck. Boy, your teaching evaluations must be *amazing*... What *is* that sucking sound, anyway? -- Arturo Magidin
From: Robert H. Lewis on 7 May 2010 18:53
> On May 7, 3:15 pm, fernando revilla > <frej0...(a)ficus.pntic.mec.es> wrote: > > Jesse F. Hughes wrote: > > > I honestly have no idea how you come to this > > > conclusion. Perhaps you > > > could point me to a post where he stated or implied > .... > > Aha. It would appear that he is running afoul of Mathforum, and this > is the result of a miscommunication because he believes he fixed the > misstatement, and does not realize that people who are not reading his > message through Mathforum *are not seeing the correction*. > > Yet another case of someone thinking that everyone is > reading this forum using the exact same interface they are... > > But that certainly clears this up. He made a mistake, > believed he had corrected it, and so thought that people who kept > bringing up the mistake were not playing fair. The rest of us, who > only saw the mistake and saw him claiming he had made none, kept > bringing it up, and found his replies evasive or insulting, since the > mistake was *clearly there* to us. > -- > Arturo Magidin I, too, read and post only through Mathforum, though I have become vaguely aware over the years that there are evidently other venues that these messages appear on. Having read the above, I now wonder whether all my messages have been seen by the people I addressed them to. Weird. How much confusion over the years is a result of this? Gee, maybe no one will ever read this post. Robert H. Lewis Fordham University |