From: Ken S. Tucker on
On Aug 1, 7:30 am, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 04:52:10 -0700 (PDT), "Ken S. Tucker"
>
> <dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote:
> >"Stretching" is commonly used here,
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_gauge
> >(as I'm sure yo'all know).
>
> > The aircraft are all weather, and quite light weight, that said,
> >in a hefty wind or heavy snow load is what needs to be designed
> >for, and sometime the a/c will do a kind of snap oscillation that
> >causes a load spike.
>
> ---
> What I'd do would be to use a length of piano wire as the strength
> member from which to hang the airplane and then just run the wiring
> next to it for the electric part.
>
> If your lighting is incandescent I doubt whether a spike would hurt
> it. To be safe, though, you could connect a couple of unidirectional
> TVSs in aseries opposition across the load.
>
> Something like a couple of Littelfuse 1.5KE160A:
>
> http://www.littelfuse.com/data/en/Data_Sheets/Littelfuse_TVS-Diode_1....
>
> should work.
>
> You could also use a single bidirectional part but they're harder to
> find.
>
> JF

Thank you Mr. Fields.
The heads up (pun) on lightning (Voltage transients) is important.
This AM we tested fine wire to breaking, it broke at 100 gms,
so I figure it's AWG 36, practically invisible, so we might try
to wrap that around 8# monofilament.
Regards
Ken
PS: My Doctor says I drink to much, then she asks, "what are you
going to do about it".
I answered, "I'll get a divorce".




From: Nunya on
On Aug 1, 7:30 am, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 04:52:10 -0700 (PDT), "Ken S. Tucker"
>
> <dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote:
> >"Stretching" is commonly used here,
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_gauge
> >(as I'm sure yo'all know).
>
> > The aircraft are all weather, and quite light weight, that said,
> >in a hefty wind or heavy snow load is what needs to be designed
> >for, and sometime the a/c will do a kind of snap oscillation that
> >causes a load spike.
>
> ---
> What I'd do would be to use a length of piano wire as the strength
> member from which to hang the airplane and then just run the wiring
> next to it for the electric part.
>
> If your lighting is incandescent I doubt whether a spike would hurt
> it.  To be safe, though, you could connect a couple of unidirectional
> TVSs in aseries opposition across the load.
>
> Something like a couple of Littelfuse 1.5KE160A:
>
> http://www.littelfuse.com/data/en/Data_Sheets/Littelfuse_TVS-Diode_1....
>
> should work.
>
> You could also use a single bidirectional part but they're harder to
> find.
>
> JF

You got it right. Use a high tensile strength carrier strand and
spiral dress a bifilar pair over that, which is able to pass the
needed current level.

Hard mounted battery packs and LED lighting would work
too. ;-)
From: John Fields on
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT), "Ken S. Tucker"
<dynamics(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote:

>On Aug 1, 7:30 am, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 04:52:10 -0700 (PDT), "Ken S. Tucker"
>>
>> <dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote:
>> >"Stretching" is commonly used here,
>> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_gauge
>> >(as I'm sure yo'all know).
>>
>> > The aircraft are all weather, and quite light weight, that said,
>> >in a hefty wind or heavy snow load is what needs to be designed
>> >for, and sometime the a/c will do a kind of snap oscillation that
>> >causes a load spike.
>>
>> ---
>> What I'd do would be to use a length of piano wire as the strength
>> member from which to hang the airplane and then just run the wiring
>> next to it for the electric part.
>>
>> If your lighting is incandescent I doubt whether a spike would hurt
>> it. To be safe, though, you could connect a couple of unidirectional
>> TVSs in aseries opposition across the load.
>>
>> Something like a couple of Littelfuse 1.5KE160A:
>>
>> http://www.littelfuse.com/data/en/Data_Sheets/Littelfuse_TVS-Diode_1....
>>
>> should work.
>>
>> You could also use a single bidirectional part but they're harder to
>> find.
>>
>> JF
>
>Thank you Mr. Fields.
>The heads up (pun) on lightning (Voltage transients) is important.
>This AM we tested fine wire to breaking, it broke at 100 gms,
>so I figure it's AWG 36, practically invisible, so we might try
>to wrap that around 8# monofilament.

---
Great idea!

One caveat... 36AWG has a resistance of about 0.415 ohms per foot and
incandescent lamps have a very nonlinear temperature coefficient of
resistance, so you may wind up with the lamps being dimmer than you'd
like and the wire hotter than the monofilament might like.

Lightning strikes?

All bets are off! ;)

From: John Larkin on
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 06:03:23 -0700 (PDT), "Ken S. Tucker"
<dynamics(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote:

>On Jul 30, 7:01 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote:
>> I've been asked to 'light-up' aircraft models, such as,
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/35156618(a)N03/4754110575/
>>
>> It is suspended from a rope.
>> I need to use very fine 120V wire (like magnetic wire),
>> the model uses 8# test monofilament right now and weighs
>> 1/2 # , but a strong wind requires that 8# test.
>> Is there a table that gives wire gauge & tensile strength?
>> The current will likely be a max of 1/2 amp.
>> Ken
>
>We put a a/c display into operation yesterday, as you guys
>can see (compared to the top photo) the suspension wire is
>too heavy.
>
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/35156618(a)N03/4848740731/
>
>The wire is ~24 gauge gray stranded speaker wire, very safe
>and strong but too visible compared to 8# monofilament fish
>line.
>Regards all and thanks for your interest.
>Ken

How about using LEDs? That are more efficient than incandescents,
wildly so if you want colors.

John

From: Ken S. Tucker on
On Aug 1, 11:54 am, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT), "Ken S. Tucker"
>
>
>
> <dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote:
> >On Aug 1, 7:30 am, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 04:52:10 -0700 (PDT), "Ken S. Tucker"
>
> >> <dynam...(a)vianet.on.ca> wrote:
> >> >"Stretching" is commonly used here,
> >> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strain_gauge
> >> >(as I'm sure yo'all know).
>
> >> > The aircraft are all weather, and quite light weight, that said,
> >> >in a hefty wind or heavy snow load is what needs to be designed
> >> >for, and sometime the a/c will do a kind of snap oscillation that
> >> >causes a load spike.
>
> >> ---
> >> What I'd do would be to use a length of piano wire as the strength
> >> member from which to hang the airplane and then just run the wiring
> >> next to it for the electric part.
>
> >> If your lighting is incandescent I doubt whether a spike would hurt
> >> it. To be safe, though, you could connect a couple of unidirectional
> >> TVSs in aseries opposition across the load.
>
> >> Something like a couple of Littelfuse 1.5KE160A:
>
> >>http://www.littelfuse.com/data/en/Data_Sheets/Littelfuse_TVS-Diode_1....
>
> >> should work.
>
> >> You could also use a single bidirectional part but they're harder to
> >> find.
>
> >> JF
>
> >Thank you Mr. Fields.
> >The heads up (pun) on lightning (Voltage transients) is important.
> >This AM we tested fine wire to breaking, it broke at 100 gms,
> >so I figure it's AWG 36, practically invisible, so we might try
> >to wrap that around 8# monofilament.
>
> ---
> Great idea!
>
> One caveat... 36AWG has a resistance of about 0.415 ohms per foot and
> incandescent lamps have a very nonlinear temperature coefficient of
> resistance, so you may wind up with the lamps being dimmer than you'd
> like and the wire hotter than the monofilament might like.

Oh-oh, time for homework, what I'll write needs to be tested.
Looked up max current for AWG 36, 1/4 Amp looks ok as it
is well cooled.
Over 10' the Ohms is ~4, max power to bulbs at 120V is 30W,
the wire takes 1 volt and therefore 1/4W.

In comparison, this unit, (day photo),
http://www.flickr.com/photos/35156618(a)N03/4850643793/
takes 7+5+5 W = 17W.
So yeah AWG 36 would be pushed.

> Lightning strikes?
> All bets are off! ;)

Lightning strikes are most dangerous if somehow they ignite
something, but a strike a few hundred feet away can produce
weird transients that attention to grounding 'should' alleviate.
Regards
Ken
PS: Incidentally, the haze in the photo is smoke from local
forest fires caused by lightning (in BC Okanagan Valley).