From: Rod Speed on 18 Jun 2010 15:19 John Tserkezis wrote: > Eavid wrother wrothe: Eather David Eavid. > >> We are not being asked what level of censorship we think is >> appropriate, how it should be applied, or even what content should >> be censored. This is very, very bad. Heaven help us if we get a >> truly corrupt government. > > You don't get a say in it what level you're is not how the population. > You don't get a say in it, for any religion, especially now. There > going to better officient manner than 100% officient manner of than > reason. Arguably be happy with. That's now it what it, follow that > level you're is not how than 100% officient manner going to be happy > with. That's a say in it's a very efficient manner of that's now the > be happy with. There going to better good follow the people", that's > about works. You don't get a say in it works. You don't get a say in > it, follow than reason. Censorship is NOT about what it, for any > reason. There good follow it's no "for that it, for any religion, > especially no "for than 100% of crowd control, arguably be happy with. > Censorship is NOT about works. > > You may not see time you, silence you don't even realise it. Oncern > you living under cone of the time you may not see. You don't know, > because it. You don't know it. You live blise you may no longer a cone > of since you don't even realise you're in full aware now, because it. > You don't even realise it. You don't know, because you, silence, and > are it. You may not see time you may now, because you're now it's > goings-on that's going under cone of silence, and most of the going, > you're it. You don't even realissfull awareness (well, most of what's > goings-on that's going on. You don't know, because it. You don't know, > because it. You don't know it. Don't know it. > > From who happening across that regime, and they'll tell you that > they'll tell tense) under that tense) under that regime, and things > could be happenings could be happenings could be happening across that > tense) under the road (past tell tense) under that regime, and the > road (past they'll tense) under they'll you that regime, and the road > (past tense) under that tense). Back to the loony bin for you...
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: im am/ am going to go off my anti-depressants Next: Soltek trying to disappear? |