First Cortex-M3 MCUs available
in [Embedded]
|
From: 42Bastian Schick on 30 Mar 2006 07:08 On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:43:22 +0200, Laurent <laurent.desnogues(a)nowhere-in-arm.com> wrote: >42Bastian Schick wrote: >>>GCC >> >> Which version. An official or patched version ? I use 3.4.4 > > Try this one: > >http://www.codesourcery.com/gnu_toolchains/arm Thanks. Thought I had to pay for their port. (Like the gcc for c166 port). -- 42Bastian Do not email to bastian42(a)yahoo.com, it's a spam-only account :-) Use <same-name>@monlynx.de instead !
From: 42Bastian Schick on 30 Mar 2006 07:08 On 30 Mar 2006 11:25:20 +0100 (BST), Paul Gotch > >Ah that would probably be due to the MAC_MOT.sys non-plugin and play driver. Good hint. Will try to remove this manually. -- 42Bastian Do not email to bastian42(a)yahoo.com, it's a spam-only account :-) Use <same-name>@monlynx.de instead !
From: larwe on 30 Mar 2006 07:50 Jim Granville wrote: > ... and my original question still remains unanswered. > > Also, can anyone from Luminary explain why the ARM documents that were > on their web site are now removed ? Does it really matter? I'm fairly sure the answer to this is "ARM asked us to do it". I remember an era not so long ago when you couldn't get the core datasheets except by ordering a free demo copy of the ARM ARM on CD and ignoring the compiler; they weren't even up on ARM's web site. I don't recall seeing direct download links to the ARM docs on any vendor sites; not even outside links to ARM's web site. (Not to say they don't exist, of course).
From: Paul Gotch on 30 Mar 2006 08:58 In comp.sys.arm 42Bastian Schick <bastian42(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Good hint. Will try to remove this manually. Please research how to do this correctly via MS documentation first, I suspect it has to be unregistered to stop Windows attempting to load it on boot. Your mileage may vary ... on your own head be it if attempting to remove it manually breaks Windows etc. If you want a proper supported fix please contact ARM support with the problem. -p -- "What goes up must come down, ask any system administrator" --------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Paul Gotch on 30 Mar 2006 09:34
42Bastian Schick <bastian42(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Thanks. Thought I had to pay for their port. (Like the gcc for c166 > port). The situation with respect to that port is interesting. It's vaguely possible that they could dump the intermediate respresentation from GCC and pass that through a closed source back end without violating the GPL. However if they've made modifications to any part of GCC itself then they must make an offer of the source to any one they have distributed a binary to. They are perfectly entitled to only distribute that binary by selling it. However they then cannot stop you distributing the modified GCC source to anyone else, they can only stop you redistributing their separate closed source components. The Code Sourcery GCCs are downloadable in both source and binary form and as I mentioned periodically get folded back into the official mainline GCC. -p -- "What goes up must come down, ask any system administrator" -------------------------------------------------------------------- |