Flower macros
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: How far have P&S's come?
Next: Why P&S's should do some reading before taking the plunge with real cameras
From: Robert Spanjaard on 30 May 2010 06:20 A couple of flower macros for you to enjoy (and/or critisize). They might do well in the Wallpaper Shootin too, especially 4 and 5. But I already submitted a different shot. http://www.arumes.com/temp/macro/ -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: David Ruether on 30 May 2010 07:21 "Robert Spanjaard" <spamtrap(a)arumes.com> wrote in message news:ce880$4c023c08$546ac3cf$1395(a)cache60.multikabel.net... >A couple of flower macros for you to enjoy (and/or critisize). > > They might do well in the Wallpaper Shootin too, especially 4 and 5. > But I already submitted a different shot. > > http://www.arumes.com/temp/macro/ > > -- > Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com I like number 4 the most. Nice forms/colors/massing/composition/ color-distribution/balance/choice-of-limited-plane-of-focus/etc. Nice! --DR
From: MC on 30 May 2010 08:14 Robert Spanjaard wrote: > A couple of flower macros for you to enjoy (and/or critisize). > > They might do well in the Wallpaper Shootin too, especially 4 and 5. > But I already submitted a different shot. > > http://www.arumes.com/temp/macro/ You should first ask yourself, as should every photographer who wishes to put their photos on public dispaly (let alone unashemedly publicise the websites containing said pictures), are they really worthy of public scrutiny? You must, firstly, be your own harshest critic and then (and only then) allow others to critcise. May I ask why you think these are worthy? MC
From: Ofnuts on 30 May 2010 08:55 On 30/05/2010 12:20, Robert Spanjaard wrote: > A couple of flower macros for you to enjoy (and/or critisize). > > They might do well in the Wallpaper Shootin too, especially 4 and 5. > But I already submitted a different shot. > > http://www.arumes.com/temp/macro/ A good wallpaper should be bland to avoid being distracting. hence instresting photos ans wallapers are in two different universes. Which one are you aiming at? -- Bertrand
From: Richard on 30 May 2010 13:13
"MC" <any(a)any.any> wrote in message news:xn0gur32t1mhtg000(a)news.virginmedia.com... > Robert Spanjaard wrote: > >> A couple of flower macros for you to enjoy (and/or critisize). >> >> They might do well in the Wallpaper Shootin too, especially 4 and 5. >> But I already submitted a different shot. >> >> http://www.arumes.com/temp/macro/ > > You should first ask yourself, as should every photographer who wishes > to put their photos on public dispaly (let alone unashemedly publicise > the websites containing said pictures), are they really worthy of > public scrutiny? You must, firstly, be your own harshest critic and > then (and only then) allow others to critcise. > > May I ask why you think these are worthy? > > MC No. If you have to ask permission to ask a question, you are not worthy of asking the question. Richard |