Prev: NOW ????????????
Next: Doesn't the interpretation of red/blue spectrum shift violate contancy of speed of light?
From: Surfer on 27 Feb 2010 02:16
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:46:48 -0800 (PST), "Dono." <sa_ge(a)comcast.net>
wrote:

>On Feb 26, 8:04 pm, Surfer <n...(a)spam.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Explain to me, in your own words, the concept of the "error bar".
>>
>> Originally a graphical representation of possible or probable error
>> which may be calculated as standard error, 95% CL or some other way.
>>
>
>Absent in the Demjanov paper. Crackpot case closed.
>
That is also not true. Fig. 1 shows an error bar as a grey band of +/-
1 mm.



From: Dono. on 27 Feb 2010 09:54
On Feb 26, 11:16 pm, Surfer <n...(a)spam.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:46:48 -0800 (PST), "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 26, 8:04 pm, Surfer <n...(a)spam.net> wrote:
>
> >> >Explain to me, in your own words, the concept of the "error bar".
>
> >> Originally a graphical representation of possible or probable error
> >> which may be calculated as standard error, 95% CL or some other way.
>
> >Absent in the Demjanov paper. Crackpot case closed.
>
> That is also not true. Fig. 1 shows an error bar as a grey band of +/-
> 1 mm.



No it doesn't, Demjanov dod not run ANY experiment to begin with.
Crackpot case closed.
From: Surfer on 27 Feb 2010 12:54
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:55:44 -0800 (PST), "Dono." <sa_ge(a)comcast.net>
wrote:

>
> Remember Trimmer's experiment?
>
Trimmer didn't use a Michelson interferometer.



From: Dono. on 27 Feb 2010 13:03
On Feb 27, 9:54 am, Surfer <n...(a)spam.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:55:44 -0800 (PST), "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Remember Trimmer's experiment?
>
> Trimmer didn't use a Michelson interferometer.



You are still a cheating idiot, Trimmer's arrangement is MMX with the
arms of different refringence indexes.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: NOW ????????????
Next: Doesn't the interpretation of red/blue spectrum shift violate contancy of speed of light?