Prev: splitting water using sunlight
Next: Forgery post to remove; pull the plug on this forger and have him pay a cleanup fee
From: Iarnrod on 8 Mar 2010 10:16
On Mar 8, 7:38 am, Hank the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor
<9-11tr...(a)experts.org> continued to suffer delusions from huffing
cleaning solutions:
> PV wrote:
> > Excuse me, I think you have a very confused idea what conspiracy theories
> > are.
>
> Yours is based on the magic powers of a bearded man living
> in a cave thousands of miles away,

Who would that be, kooker? UBL, who of course has admitted he did
this, did not live in a cave; he is a multi-millionaire and at the
time was an honored guest of the Taliban, a pampered terrorist. This
is not in dispute.

Tell us, janitor boy, what “magic powers” are involved in hijacking an
airplane and crashing it. What is it you view as requiring “magic” in
this? <chuckle>

> from where he can suspend the principles of physics

How about you try to tell us what principles of physics you “think”
were suspended that day, dearie, and explain how you imagine that
could be possible. I’ll bet your “drugs” are involved somewhere here!
<snicker>

The official findings are in fact the only scenario fully consistent
with all the principles of physics. Principles of physics are what
show us the kooker theories of physically impossible cartoon-magic
“controlled demolition” are what is impossible. <guffaw>

> and shut down NORAD at will. <chuckle>

Tell us when NORAD was shut down in your kooker delusional view of the
world. You seem unaware that NORAD was in fact fully involved on 9/11.
Is it the cleaning solution affecting what’s left of your “brain,”
Hankie?

> > Also noted - you can't do highschool physics problems. Who's ignorant
> > here? *
>
> Since you believe the government's insane physics, reality, and
> evidence defying cave man conspiracy theory, that'd be you.

Tell us what you “imagine” defies the official findings, Hankie. You
can’t and you won’t.
From: spudnik on 8 Mar 2010 14:54
re "spheres of nanothermite,"
do either of you know the primary use of thermite, and
what it is made of?

> Dynamic load, simple physics. No other explanation even comes close to
> fitting.

thus:
I respect his right to wait til "P3" is out, but
a precis would be appreciated.

and, please, don't just *say* that Michelson, Morley et al go "no"
results,
because they actually got some (small) seasonal anomalies --
that goes for you, two, Uncle Al!

> Experimental constraints on Special Relativity

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.com
From: Iarnrod on 9 Mar 2010 09:55
On Mar 9, 6:30 am, Hankie the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor
<9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> AllYou! wrote:
> > Then use wooden box instead.  It's irrelevant.  The experiment
> > simply shows the significant difference between a static load, and
> > one which is falling.
>
>   The falling upper block was exerting less force on the
> undamaged steel frame below while it was accelerating
> downward than when it was stationary. Fundamental
> physics destroys your fairy tale yet again.

BWAHAAAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!! Hankie actually proposes the opposite of
reality!

Too funny, Hank!

Tell ya what, why doncha lean up against the bumper of a car, tell us
how that feels, then let that car hit you at, oh, 10 mph, and report
back, then let it hit you at 40 mph, and report back....

I have to admit, this latest nutbaggery from you actually made me
laugh out loud!!

> As always, here's hard proof.

As always, thank you. The hard proof you always provide is that of
your insanity!
From: PV on 9 Mar 2010 11:12
Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> writes:
>Tell ya what, why doncha lean up against the bumper of a car, tell us
>how that feels, then let that car hit you at, oh, 10 mph, and report
>back, then let it hit you at 40 mph, and report back....

I love it when he talks about "elementary physics", yet over and over
illustrates that he doesn't know what physics even IS.

Here's another example of dynamic vs static load. When you go rock
climbing, you can use the same rope and carabiners for a long time, years
if they're in good shape, but if you take ONE fall of more than 25 feet,
any rope or protection equipment that saved your life must never be used
again. It will not survive another drop. *
--
* PV Something like badgers, something like lizards, and something
like corkscrews.
From: AllYou! on 9 Mar 2010 11:20
In news:PLqdnVUecuL07gvWnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d(a)supernews.com,
PV <pv+usenet(a)pobox.com> mused:
> Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> writes:
>> Tell ya what, why doncha lean up against the bumper of a car,
>> tell us how that feels, then let that car hit you at, oh, 10
>> mph, and report back, then let it hit you at 40 mph, and report
>> back....
>
> I love it when he talks about "elementary physics", yet over and
> over illustrates that he doesn't know what physics even IS.
>
> Here's another example of dynamic vs static load. When you go
> rock climbing, you can use the same rope and carabiners for a
> long time, years if they're in good shape, but if you take ONE
> fall of more than 25 feet, any rope or protection equipment that
> saved your life must never be used again. It will not survive
> another drop. * --

He clearly doesn't understand the differences among force, mass,
momentum, acceleration, velocity, and speed. He also doesn't
understand that the force that an object exerts on something can be
less than its potential total if that something fails.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: splitting water using sunlight
Next: Forgery post to remove; pull the plug on this forger and have him pay a cleanup fee