Prev: splitting water using sunlight
Next: Forgery post to remove; pull the plug on this forger and have him pay a cleanup fee
From: Iarnrod on 9 Mar 2010 14:57
On Mar 9, 9:20 am, "AllYou!" <ida...(a)conversent.net> wrote:
> Innews:PLqdnVUecuL07gvWnZ2dnUVZ_u6dnZ2d(a)supernews.com,
> PV <pv+use...(a)pobox.com> mused:
>
> > Iarnrod <iarn...(a)yahoo.com> writes:
> >> Tell ya what, why doncha lean up against the bumper of a car,
> >> tell us how that feels, then let that car hit you at, oh, 10
> >> mph, and report back, then let it hit you at 40 mph, and report
> >> back....
>
> > I love it when he talks about "elementary physics", yet over and
> > over illustrates that he doesn't know what physics even IS.
>
> > Here's another example of dynamic vs static load. When you go
> > rock climbing, you can use the same rope and carabiners for a
> > long time, years if they're in good shape, but if you take ONE
> > fall of more than 25 feet, any rope or protection equipment that
> > saved your life must never be used again. It will not survive
> > another drop. * --
>
> He clearly doesn't understand the differences among force, mass,
> momentum, acceleration, velocity, and speed.  He also doesn't
> understand that the force that an object exerts on something can be
> less than its potential total if that something fails.

Hank inhaled too many cleaning solution fumes before being fired from
his janitor job at Cornell.
From: Iarnrod on 12 Mar 2010 10:28
On Mar 12, 8:11 am, Hank the Self-Admitted Fired Janitor
<9-11kooker...(a)idiots.org> lied:
> AllYou! wrote:
> > Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> mused:
> >> AllYou! wrote:
> >>>>> There's no proof of free fall in any of that, nor is there any
> >>>>> explanation of what could've caused free fall.
> >>>> Nine minutes into the video. You appear to be insane.
> >>  Did you see it yet, nutjob? Nine minutes into the video.
> >>  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA
> > "In every photo and every video, you can see columns far outpacing
> > the collapse of the building.
>
>   WTC7. World Trade Center Seven. Learn how to read and think.
> Did you see it yet? Nine minutes into the video. Free fall.
>
>  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA

What Hankie fails to grasp even after repeated correction of his false
premises is that the final collapse of the unsupported north and west
walls took place in excess of 10 seconds AFTER the south portion of
the building already had progressively collapsed into Vesey Street.
The last 6.5 seconds of near-free fall was the final portion of the
building. The lower columns buckled after the remaining support
structure of the building was gone. Hank ignores this inconvenient
truth.
From: Iarnrod on 12 Mar 2010 10:51
On Mar 12, 8:45 am, Hank the Chemical Huffing Fired Janitor
<9-11liar...(a)kookers.org> lied:
> Mighty Iarnrod continued to pummel Hankie with proven FACTS:
>
> > Henry lied:
> >>   WTC7. World Trade Center Seven. Learn how to read and think.
> >> Did you see it yet? Nine minutes into the video. Free fall.
> >>  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA
> > The last 6.5 seconds of near-free fall was the final portion of the
> > building.
>
>   Wrong, nut job.

<chuckle> Hankie again shows he has not yet seen the video!!

> Free fall took place at the onset of the demolition.

1) Demolition of the WTC7 building has been proven to be physically
impossible. No explosions are occurring and your cite proves this. Try
watching it with the sound on, Hankie. <chuckle>
2) The near-free fall at the end came only after the entire east and
south portions of the building already were dumped into Vesey Street
by the progressive collapse. Proven FACT that you cannot deny.

> As always, here's hard proof.

Proof of your lying, you mean!
From: Iarnrod on 15 Mar 2010 09:38
On Mar 15, 7:16 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> Peter Webb wrote:
> > "Henry" <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote in message
> >>  This video proves free fall. Even NIST was finally forced
> >> to admit it. This is shown nine minutes into the video.
> >>  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA
>
> >>  Here's the quote you need to focus on. Read it, understand
> >> it, and lose the insanity and delusions...
> >>  "Anyone knows that a building cannot collapse at the rate of a freely
> >> falling object while simultaneously crushing 40,000 tons of structural
> >> steel because all of its gravitational potential energy has been
> >> converted to motion."
> >>http://www.ae911truth.org/info/75
> > Ahh yes, but what speed does it actually fall at?
>
>   WTC7 accelerated downward at free fall speed.

16+ seconds isn't freefall speed, Hankie the Self-Admitted Fired
Janitor. Stop sniffing your cleaning solutions and clear your "brain."

<chuckle>
From: Iarnrod on 15 Mar 2010 18:50
On Mar 15, 8:05 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> Iarnrod wrote:
> > On Mar 15, 7:44 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >> AllYou! wrote:
> >>> They claim that the building fell at free fall speed (which tells us
> >>> that they know nothing about the difference between acceleration vs.
> >>> velocity), and that the 'pancake' effect would result in a fall less
> >>> than that.
> >>  You're still not reading or thinking. In the paper below,
> >> the author calculates the North Tower's downward acceleration
> >> at 64% of free fall.
> > Soooo,in other words, you're a liar when you claim it was free fall.
>
>   I didn't state that WTC1 or WTC2 dropped at free fall speed,

Oh, so you are changing your mind. Good for you! Are the chemicals
wearing off? <chuckle> Your many betters have been concerned about
your mental stability.

> You're "thinking" of WTC7, which was a different building.

Nope, not thinking about that. I was thinking about the building YOU
brought up, the North tower, nutjob. Can't you even follow your OWN
posts? <chuckle>

WTC7 did not fall at free fall speed either, unless you "think" it
fell from a mile up!

> But thanks for proving yet again that you can't read or think,
> that you lie a lot, and that you're quite stupid... <chuckle>

Thanks for projecting!

<snicker>
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: splitting water using sunlight
Next: Forgery post to remove; pull the plug on this forger and have him pay a cleanup fee