From: gb6726 on
On Aug 15, 2:24 am, gb6726 <gb6...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2:17 am, gb6726 <gb6...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Humanitarian crimes to fascist somebody in terroristic psychological
> > > forms. You don't know him how he is in real life. You cannot fascist-
> > > terrorize people, it is what people in Abu Ghraib did, aimed toward
> > > personal destruction. Are you like that in real life, telling co-
> > > workers that they are mental psychopaths? You would be fired for
> > > cruelty. In fact it is you who displays mental illness and terroristic
> > > qualities of fascist nature in subliminative supremacy, dominating
> > > terrorizing criminal of mind supremacy and torture. American or
> > > British, rarely others, go figure a nazi deathcamp of what people say
> > > to those raising negative discussion on Einstein. Incredible people
> > > online. When I was first talked to like that I actually ended up in a
> > > mental institute for a week, but not before. The power of online.
>
> > I never in my life experienced anything like that. I actually feared
> > going online for months after that.
>
> We hear of psychos like the Texas chainsaw massacre and killers
> in horror movies, but that kind of psycho that you are talking about
> for somebody doing who knows what refutung einstein is literal
> humanitarian terrorism. You can't do that to anybody and you should go
> to jail for criminal psychotic stalking yourself. It means that the
> only
> psycho attacking people violently here is you and if you do that to
> an unaware person, he gets very scared and molested criminally.

This is what I was suffering about mentally for years. I couldn't get
it what and why and where and why are people so offensive and
terrorizingly, things I've never in my life experienced and read
in history books of such psychological terrorism taking place
during wars, where psycho was the topic.


From: gb6726 on
On Aug 15, 2:27 am, gb6726 <gb6...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2:24 am, gb6726 <gb6...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 15, 2:17 am, gb6726 <gb6...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Humanitarian crimes to fascist somebody in terroristic psychological
> > > > forms. You don't know him how he is in real life. You cannot fascist-
> > > > terrorize people, it is what people in Abu Ghraib did, aimed toward
> > > > personal destruction. Are you like that in real life, telling co-
> > > > workers that they are mental psychopaths? You would be fired for
> > > > cruelty. In fact it is you who displays mental illness and terroristic
> > > > qualities of fascist nature in subliminative supremacy, dominating
> > > > terrorizing criminal of mind supremacy and torture. American or
> > > > British, rarely others, go figure a nazi deathcamp of what people say
> > > > to those raising negative discussion on Einstein. Incredible people
> > > > online. When I was first talked to like that I actually ended up in a
> > > > mental institute for a week, but not before. The power of online.
>
> > > I never in my life experienced anything like that. I actually feared
> > > going online for months after that.
>
> > We hear of psychos like the Texas chainsaw massacre and killers
> > in horror movies, but that kind of psycho that you are talking about
> > for somebody doing who knows what refutung einstein is literal
> > humanitarian terrorism. You can't do that to anybody and you should go
> > to jail for criminal psychotic stalking yourself. It means that the
> > only
> > psycho attacking people violently here is you and if you do that to
> > an unaware person, he gets very scared and molested criminally.
>
> This is what I was suffering about mentally for years. I couldn't get
> it what and why and where and why are people so offensive and
> terrorizingly, things I've never in my life experienced and read
> in history books of such psychological terrorism taking place
> during wars, where psycho was the topic.

Criminal torture, inclined sadism, terroristic mindset. Psychologists
probably understand. I worked 6 years in neuropsychology and couldn't
take it. I was trustful.


From: gb6726 on
On Aug 15, 2:27 am, gb6726 <gb6...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2:24 am, gb6726 <gb6...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 15, 2:17 am, gb6726 <gb6...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Humanitarian crimes to fascist somebody in terroristic psychological
> > > > forms. You don't know him how he is in real life. You cannot fascist-
> > > > terrorize people, it is what people in Abu Ghraib did, aimed toward
> > > > personal destruction. Are you like that in real life, telling co-
> > > > workers that they are mental psychopaths? You would be fired for
> > > > cruelty. In fact it is you who displays mental illness and terroristic
> > > > qualities of fascist nature in subliminative supremacy, dominating
> > > > terrorizing criminal of mind supremacy and torture. American or
> > > > British, rarely others, go figure a nazi deathcamp of what people say
> > > > to those raising negative discussion on Einstein. Incredible people
> > > > online. When I was first talked to like that I actually ended up in a
> > > > mental institute for a week, but not before. The power of online.
>
> > > I never in my life experienced anything like that. I actually feared
> > > going online for months after that.
>
> > We hear of psychos like the Texas chainsaw massacre and killers
> > in horror movies, but that kind of psycho that you are talking about
> > for somebody doing who knows what refutung einstein is literal
> > humanitarian terrorism. You can't do that to anybody and you should go
> > to jail for criminal psychotic stalking yourself. It means that the
> > only
> > psycho attacking people violently here is you and if you do that to
> > an unaware person, he gets very scared and molested criminally.
>
> This is what I was suffering about mentally for years. I couldn't get
> it what and why and where and why are people so offensive and
> terrorizingly, things I've never in my life experienced and read
> in history books of such psychological terrorism taking place
> during wars, where psycho was the topic.

In the Bushworld, is what it has become. A life of all people talking
like the man with the deep voice in the theater previews. Republicans
shouldn't post. They have no manners, no humanity of any kind,
merely dictating qualities. Humanity can solve all these things too,
not only psychology. Once a person is repressed into fears of not
having been able to stand up and discriminated against in the most
horrifyingly stalking ways of ego-driven destruction of personality,
a revenge that is in the eye in instant ego-destructing responses,
ego-centric hatered inflicting terrorism and subliminative
totalitarianism
over life, psycho is used as psycho infliction, terrorism is used as
terroristic infliction, humanity is destroyed, and something driven
by vengefulness in the eye of the terrorist seeks harm and subliminacy
in all things, aims to kill mind with mind, blindness of terrorism
implied
in meaningless suicidal ways, that person is obviously not a criminal,
not attacking anybody, not carrying a threat to anybody, your calling
him a psycho is violent and sadistic and tormented and an ill-fated
hate crime of terrorism.



From: George Dishman on

Henri Wilson wrote:

> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:21:07 +0100, "George Dishman" <george(a)briar.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >"Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message news:k77nb3tqiivi90hjf5oh70nnb3irn560hb(a)4ax.com...
> >>
> >> ... Think about the reflections from each moving mirror.
> >
> >The incident speed is c so the reflected speed is
> >c, it does not explain the difference in arrival
> >times. We covered that in February 2004 from the
> >file date of this!
>
> We werer wrong. At that stage, I had not realised the significance of the
> 'photon axis tilt'.
> My conclusion, Light DOES NOT reflect at the incident speed and angle from a
> moving mirror.
>
> > http://www.briar.demon.co.uk/Henri/speed.gif
>
> Yes it is wrong.

Then you need to change the equations of ballistic theory
to predict a different reflected speed and angle. Those new
equations might mean you need to rework your grating
analysis as well but hopefully you'll get the same answer.
Let me know when your new theory is ready but don't worry,
I won't be holding my breath.

George

From: Henri Wilson on
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 00:35:11 -0700, George Dishman <george(a)briar.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

>
>sean wrote:
>
>> On 6 Aug, 08:44, George Dishman <geo...(a)briar.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> > On 5 Aug, 13:45, sean <jaymose...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:


>
>> ... How many times have I said that all the
>> observations of light point to it being wave like and
>> as having a propoagation speed always at c relative to the
>> source?
>> I never said its particle like . None of the evidence
>> points to it having mass or particle like properties. Thats
>> your delusion.
>
>No, that's the black-body curve, the photoelectric effect
>and many modern experiments where individual photons
>are manipulated. All the evidence points that way, but
>note that all particles have wave-like properties. Reality
>is somewhere between the two that has no counterpart
>in our macroscopic view of the world.

What about MY photon model? It bridges the gap perfectly.


www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

The difference between a preacher and a used car salesman is that the latter at least has a product to sell.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
Prev: What is the Aether?
Next: Debunking Nimtz