From: BURT on
General Relativity contradicts the Special Theory in the case of a
black hole horizon. There is an end to time giving an infinite red
shift and a speed of light freefall. And if there is more gravity
inside that speed of light fall for energy must increase beyond C.

Gravity at the extreme of black holes proves to be a failure. We need
a kind of limited gravity theory that discounts black holes. The
redshifts we see are supermassive neutron stars.

Stephen Hawking said that GR predicted its own failure by predicting
infinities of a singularity. I point out there are other
contradictions that begin at the periphery of all black holes.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on
On Mar 20, 10:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> General Relativity contradicts the Special Theory in the case of a
> black hole horizon. There is an end to time giving an infinite red
> shift and a speed of light freefall.  And if there is more gravity
> inside that speed of light fall for energy must increase beyond C.
>
> Gravity at the extreme of black holes proves to be a failure. We need
> a kind of limited gravity theory that discounts black holes.

Wal-Mart might be able to help you out, but it would have to be
Chinese black holes.
From: Don Stockbauer on
On Mar 22, 3:26 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 20, 10:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > General Relativity contradicts the Special Theory in the case of a
> > black hole horizon. There is an end to time giving an infinite red
> > shift and a speed of light freefall.  And if there is more gravity
> > inside that speed of light fall for energy must increase beyond C.
>
> > Gravity at the extreme of black holes proves to be a failure. We need
> > a kind of limited gravity theory that discounts black holes.
>
> Wal-Mart might be able to help you out, but it would have to be
> Chinese black holes.

This post no content.
From: BURT on
On Mar 23, 4:34 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 22, 3:26 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 20, 10:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > General Relativity contradicts the Special Theory in the case of a
> > > black hole horizon. There is an end to time giving an infinite red
> > > shift and a speed of light freefall.  And if there is more gravity
> > > inside that speed of light fall for energy must increase beyond C.
>
> > > Gravity at the extreme of black holes proves to be a failure. We need
> > > a kind of limited gravity theory that discounts black holes.
>
> > Wal-Mart might be able to help you out, but it would have to be
> > Chinese black holes.
>
> This post no content.

GR violates SR at the event horizon by causing the end of time and
light speed freefall. And if there is even more gravity inside a black
hole acceleration ought to push matter faster than light. Black holes
are a theoretical failure. Even Hawking pointed this out. The
singularity is a problem but so is the event horizon.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on
On Mar 23, 3:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 23, 4:34 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 22, 3:26 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 20, 10:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > General Relativity contradicts the Special Theory in the case of a
> > > > black hole horizon. There is an end to time giving an infinite red
> > > > shift and a speed of light freefall.  And if there is more gravity
> > > > inside that speed of light fall for energy must increase beyond C.
>
> > > > Gravity at the extreme of black holes proves to be a failure. We need
> > > > a kind of limited gravity theory that discounts black holes.
>
> > > Wal-Mart might be able to help you out, but it would have to be
> > > Chinese black holes.
>
> > This post no content.
>
> GR violates SR at the event horizon by causing the end of time and
> light speed freefall. And if there is even more gravity inside a black
> hole acceleration ought to push matter faster than light. Black holes
> are a theoretical failure. Even Hawking pointed this out. The
> singularity is a problem but so is the event horizon.
>

So they don't exist?