From: BURT on 20 Mar 2010 23:13 General Relativity contradicts the Special Theory in the case of a black hole horizon. There is an end to time giving an infinite red shift and a speed of light freefall. And if there is more gravity inside that speed of light fall for energy must increase beyond C. Gravity at the extreme of black holes proves to be a failure. We need a kind of limited gravity theory that discounts black holes. The redshifts we see are supermassive neutron stars. Stephen Hawking said that GR predicted its own failure by predicting infinities of a singularity. I point out there are other contradictions that begin at the periphery of all black holes. Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 22 Mar 2010 04:26 On Mar 20, 10:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > General Relativity contradicts the Special Theory in the case of a > black hole horizon. There is an end to time giving an infinite red > shift and a speed of light freefall. And if there is more gravity > inside that speed of light fall for energy must increase beyond C. > > Gravity at the extreme of black holes proves to be a failure. We need > a kind of limited gravity theory that discounts black holes. Wal-Mart might be able to help you out, but it would have to be Chinese black holes.
From: Don Stockbauer on 23 Mar 2010 07:34 On Mar 22, 3:26 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 20, 10:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > General Relativity contradicts the Special Theory in the case of a > > black hole horizon. There is an end to time giving an infinite red > > shift and a speed of light freefall. And if there is more gravity > > inside that speed of light fall for energy must increase beyond C. > > > Gravity at the extreme of black holes proves to be a failure. We need > > a kind of limited gravity theory that discounts black holes. > > Wal-Mart might be able to help you out, but it would have to be > Chinese black holes. This post no content.
From: BURT on 23 Mar 2010 16:50 On Mar 23, 4:34 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 22, 3:26 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 20, 10:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > General Relativity contradicts the Special Theory in the case of a > > > black hole horizon. There is an end to time giving an infinite red > > > shift and a speed of light freefall. And if there is more gravity > > > inside that speed of light fall for energy must increase beyond C. > > > > Gravity at the extreme of black holes proves to be a failure. We need > > > a kind of limited gravity theory that discounts black holes. > > > Wal-Mart might be able to help you out, but it would have to be > > Chinese black holes. > > This post no content. GR violates SR at the event horizon by causing the end of time and light speed freefall. And if there is even more gravity inside a black hole acceleration ought to push matter faster than light. Black holes are a theoretical failure. Even Hawking pointed this out. The singularity is a problem but so is the event horizon. Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 23 Mar 2010 19:59 On Mar 23, 3:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mar 23, 4:34 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 22, 3:26 am, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 20, 10:13 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > General Relativity contradicts the Special Theory in the case of a > > > > black hole horizon. There is an end to time giving an infinite red > > > > shift and a speed of light freefall. And if there is more gravity > > > > inside that speed of light fall for energy must increase beyond C. > > > > > Gravity at the extreme of black holes proves to be a failure. We need > > > > a kind of limited gravity theory that discounts black holes. > > > > Wal-Mart might be able to help you out, but it would have to be > > > Chinese black holes. > > > This post no content. > > GR violates SR at the event horizon by causing the end of time and > light speed freefall. And if there is even more gravity inside a black > hole acceleration ought to push matter faster than light. Black holes > are a theoretical failure. Even Hawking pointed this out. The > singularity is a problem but so is the event horizon. > So they don't exist?
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Breed like rabbits, die like rabbits. Next: Einstein Proved Right - Again! |