From: spudnik on 2 Nov 2009 21:16 "empirically known ration?" yeah; depends upon how you define the word, that is more powerful than its anagram(s)! > that sifts it out of the mix of matter/antimatter. Empirically, it is known > that there is a ratio of, IIRC, 10^7 - 10^10 more matter then antimatter thus: you're implying that "Heawood's mistaken proof" was actually correct, iff you've proven the four-color theorem? > It's always possible to give triangle numbers so that all vertices have a vertex number of 0. It's Heawood's equivalent formulation of the 4 color theorem ( Heawood's vertex character on the dual of a cubic map). > > But does there exist a proof or disproof for the following statement: > Given all the 2^(2v-4) combinations of triangle numbers, then any set of v-2 vertex numbers has all the 3^(v-2) different combinations of vertex numbers if the two missing vertices are adjacent? --McSudan Crusades for carbon credits!?!
From: Sam Wormley on 3 Nov 2009 14:19 Sam Wormley wrote: > Inertial wrote: >> >> Who is Mike Varney, and why is Porat so obsessed with him that he >> keeps hoping this Varney person has returned? Were they lovers? >> >> > > Mike is a PhD physicist that doesn't suffer fools gladly. > It is a lot of fun when Mike pops in to visit the newsgroup > now and then! > Maybe, just maybe, Mike is here now!
From: BURT on 3 Nov 2009 17:55 On Nov 3, 11:19 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)mchsi.com> wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: > > Inertial wrote: > > >> Who is Mike Varney, and why is Porat so obsessed with him that he > >> keeps hoping this Varney person has returned? Were they lovers? > > > Mike is a PhD physicist that doesn't suffer fools gladly. > > It is a lot of fun when Mike pops in to visit the newsgroup > > now and then! > > Maybe, just maybe, Mike is here now! Black holes don't happen in the aether. We are seeing the extreme but not them at all. Mitch Raemsch
From: Y.y.Porat on 6 Nov 2009 02:50 On Nov 3, 9:19 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)mchsi.com> wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: > > Inertial wrote: > > >> Who is Mike Varney, and why is Porat so obsessed with him that he > >> keeps hoping this Varney person has returned? Were they lovers? > > > Mike is a PhD physicist that doesn't suffer fools gladly. > > It is a lot of fun when Mike pops in to visit the newsgroup > > now and then! > > Maybe, just maybe, Mike is here now! ---------------- and his new name is Alpha 9though he is not intelligent enough to know what is the origin of that name he chose for himself that fucken PHd of yours never talks physics !! only personal abuse 2 he as well as you has some greetings from your Higges Bosons and you dont deserve more than that !! Y.P ---------------------------------
From: Aleph on 8 Nov 2009 10:55
On Friday 06 November 2009 07:45, in <27ad32de-9590-43da- bc15-19e83c1f6726(a)v30g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, Y.y.Porat sat down and wrote: > Hi orchestra conductor miserable parrot: > > TELL ME WHO ARE YOUR HEROES > AND I WILL TELL YOU **WHO ARE YOU !!** They certainly dont include you. > btw > you have some greetings from your > Higgs Bosons Wow, was this an attempt at a joke? Bravo. -- Aleph This message was posted to usenet so please reply that way. Emails to this account are very likely to be ignored. |