Prev: The 1~10% hollow moon / Brad Guth
Next: Everything has its own Aether
From: Y.Porat on 9 Nov 2009 20:16
On Nov 10, 1:12 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> "PD" <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:5666a609-3dac-42f4-81bd-bf67e70e1947(a)s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Nov 9, 3:08 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I take it that the self-proclaimed professor known as Paul Draper is
> >> contemplating to join the college drop.
>
> > Hmmmm??
>
> >> That is just fine with me.
> >> If you don’t know jack-$hit, I’d rather you to shut up instead of
> >> ranting off like idiots which serves no useful purpose.  <shrug>
>
> > Oh, I'm sure you'd like everyone to shut up.
>
> >> The following two great posts by the ever so humble yours truly have
> >> never been challenged with rational arguments so far.
>
> > You know, there are a couple of nutjobs who spend their days being
> > perches for pigeons in the park, who've never had their rantings
> > challenged by rational arguments so far, either.
>
> > I don't know where you get the notion that if someone doesn't rise up
> > to your foaming and blathering and try to convince you you're wrong,
> > then you can assume you're right. That's the hallmark of a lunatic who
> > has let his prescription expire.
>
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/c540aaf2341....
>
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/3f25ece8394....
>
> >> If you offer no rational arguments, just shut up, OK?
>
> > You've gone completely nutters there, Kooky Wobbly. You're posting on
> > an open-access newsgroup and you think you have any right to control
> > who responds to what and in what manner? If you want control over what
> > kind of responses you get, then you should consider posting to a blog.
> > Those are free too, and you'll look a little less loopy.
>
> I don't know if he would.  Loopy is as loopy posts.

------------------------
Hi bump parasite Feuerbacher
---------------------------
From: Inertial on 9 Nov 2009 22:06
"Y.Porat" <y.y.porat(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e69eeef8-d77f-4463-8a2a-2def9b59996b(a)p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 10, 1:12 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
>> "PD" <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:5666a609-3dac-42f4-81bd-bf67e70e1947(a)s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 9, 3:08 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I take it that the self-proclaimed professor known as Paul Draper is
>> >> contemplating to join the college drop.
>>
>> > Hmmmm??
>>
>> >> That is just fine with me.
>> >> If you don�t know jack-$hit, I�d rather you to shut up instead of
>> >> ranting off like idiots which serves no useful purpose. <shrug>
>>
>> > Oh, I'm sure you'd like everyone to shut up.
>>
>> >> The following two great posts by the ever so humble yours truly have
>> >> never been challenged with rational arguments so far.
>>
>> > You know, there are a couple of nutjobs who spend their days being
>> > perches for pigeons in the park, who've never had their rantings
>> > challenged by rational arguments so far, either.
>>
>> > I don't know where you get the notion that if someone doesn't rise up
>> > to your foaming and blathering and try to convince you you're wrong,
>> > then you can assume you're right. That's the hallmark of a lunatic who
>> > has let his prescription expire.
>>
>> >>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/c540aaf2341...
>>
>> >>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/3f25ece8394...
>>
>> >> If you offer no rational arguments, just shut up, OK?
>>
>> > You've gone completely nutters there, Kooky Wobbly. You're posting on
>> > an open-access newsgroup and you think you have any right to control
>> > who responds to what and in what manner? If you want control over what
>> > kind of responses you get, then you should consider posting to a blog.
>> > Those are free too, and you'll look a little less loopy.
>>
>> I don't know if he would. Loopy is as loopy posts.
>
> ------------------------
> Hi bump parasite Feuerbacher

You stalking me now Porat .. and lying again as well. You have zero
credibility as you are a demonstrated liar and cheat.


From: Y.Porat on 10 Nov 2009 02:11
On Nov 10, 5:06 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:e69eeef8-d77f-4463-8a2a-2def9b59996b(a)p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Nov 10, 1:12 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
> >> "PD" <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:5666a609-3dac-42f4-81bd-bf67e70e1947(a)s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com....
>
> >> > On Nov 9, 3:08 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> I take it that the self-proclaimed professor known as Paul Draper is
> >> >> contemplating to join the college drop.
>
> >> > Hmmmm??
>
> >> >> That is just fine with me.
> >> >> If you don’t know jack-$hit, I’d rather you to shut up instead of
> >> >> ranting off like idiots which serves no useful purpose.  <shrug>
>
> >> > Oh, I'm sure you'd like everyone to shut up.
>
> >> >> The following two great posts by the ever so humble yours truly have
> >> >> never been challenged with rational arguments so far.
>
> >> > You know, there are a couple of nutjobs who spend their days being
> >> > perches for pigeons in the park, who've never had their rantings
> >> > challenged by rational arguments so far, either.
>
> >> > I don't know where you get the notion that if someone doesn't rise up
> >> > to your foaming and blathering and try to convince you you're wrong,
> >> > then you can assume you're right. That's the hallmark of a lunatic who
> >> > has let his prescription expire.
>
> >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/c540aaf2341...
>
> >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/3f25ece8394...
>
> >> >> If you offer no rational arguments, just shut up, OK?
>
> >> > You've gone completely nutters there, Kooky Wobbly. You're posting on
> >> > an open-access newsgroup and you think you have any right to control
> >> > who responds to what and in what manner? If you want control over what
> >> > kind of responses you get, then you should consider posting to a blog.
> >> > Those are free too, and you'll look a little less loopy.
>
> >> I don't know if he would.  Loopy is as loopy posts.
>
> > ------------------------
> > Hi  bump    parasite Feuerbacher
>
> You stalking me now Porat .. and lying again as well.  You have zero
> credibility as you are a demonstrated liar and cheat.
-------------------
Hi Feuerbacher!!
who is the lier ?? (:-)

Y.P
-----------------------
From: Koobee Wublee on 10 Nov 2009 03:04
On Nov 9, 7:06 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:

> You stalking me now Porat .. and lying again as well.

I thought crybabies are expected from toddlers under 5 years of age.
<shrug> It looks like the dumb-fvck Inertial is a crybaby. <shrug>

> You have zero
> credibility as you are a demonstrated liar and cheat.

Going wishy-washy as if ([v_12] + [v_21] = 0) is a necessary condition
in the principle of relativity, Inertial has demonstrated himself as a
cheat. <shrug>

I predict the hypocrite which called itself inertial will deny his
doing while his doing is already casted in "stone" among all these
posts. Inertial is a zombie which implies brain dead, a drone which
serves the purpose of its master(s), and a zealous and ferocious
consumer of the last drops of fermented diarrhea that Einstein the
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar chose to leave behind. <shrug>

From: BURT on 10 Nov 2009 04:40
On Nov 10, 12:04 am, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 7:06 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote:
>
> > You stalking me now Porat .. and lying again as well.
>
> I thought crybabies are expected from toddlers under 5 years of age.
> <shrug>  It looks like the dumb-fvck Inertial is a crybaby.  <shrug>
>
> > You have zero
> > credibility as you are a demonstrated liar and cheat.
>
> Going wishy-washy as if ([v_12] + [v_21] = 0) is a necessary condition
> in the principle of relativity, Inertial has demonstrated himself as a
> cheat.  <shrug>
>
> I predict the hypocrite which called itself inertial will deny his
> doing while his doing is already casted in "stone" among all these
> posts.  Inertial is a zombie which implies brain dead, a drone which
> serves the purpose of its master(s), and a zealous and ferocious
> consumer of the last drops of fermented diarrhea that Einstein the
> nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar chose to leave behind.  <shrug>

Sapce contracting in the metric discussed will go to zero at the
horizon another contrdaction in the theory. There are other proofs of
its failure.

Mitch Raemsch
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Prev: The 1~10% hollow moon / Brad Guth
Next: Everything has its own Aether