GR prediction for precession of perihelion of Mercury is not quite right
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Fraternal Twins going equally fast at all times?
Next: dimensional analysis of BP's Waxman's arbitraguers' WSUrinal's "cap&tax" nostrum?
From: eric gisse on 27 Jun 2010 20:12 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: [...] > Orbit precession is significantly influenced by the finite speed of > gravity. As you have done many times previously, you make a guess based on the existence of something that has not been observed. When asked to make a testable prediction, you refuse and say something snide. Are you going to present your testable prediction, or are you going to say something snide? I'm leaning towards 'something snide'. Dance for me, puppet. > > Henry Wilson... > > .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: eric gisse on 27 Jun 2010 20:13 J. Clarke wrote: [...] You are arguing with the fake idiot who posts behind anonymous proxies. Killfile the domain and move on.
From: Henry Wilson DSc on 28 Jun 2010 18:17 On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:12:54 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> wrote: >..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >[...] > >> Orbit precession is significantly influenced by the finite speed of >> gravity. > >As you have done many times previously, you make a guess based on the >existence of something that has not been observed. When asked to make a >testable prediction, you refuse and say something snide. > >Are you going to present your testable prediction, or are you going to say >something snide? I'm leaning towards 'something snide'. > >Dance for me, puppet. It should be obvious that, if a force takes time to operate, its direction of action will vary with relative target speed. One doesn't have to be a genius to deduce that orbit precession will result from this. >> Henry Wilson... >> >> .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space. Henry Wilson... ........Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: PD on 28 Jun 2010 18:30 On Jun 28, 5:17 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:12:54 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > >..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >[...] > > >> Orbit precession is significantly influenced by the finite speed of > >> gravity. > > >As you have done many times previously, you make a guess based on the > >existence of something that has not been observed. When asked to make a > >testable prediction, you refuse and say something snide. > > >Are you going to present your testable prediction, or are you going to say > >something snide? I'm leaning towards 'something snide'. > > >Dance for me, puppet. > > It should be obvious that, if a force takes time to operate, its direction of > action will vary with relative target speed. > One doesn't have to be a genius to deduce that orbit precession will result > from this. > Fascinating. So according to you, no central force with a finite transmission speed can produce a stable elliptical orbit? And you say this is obvious? Would you like to work through that derivation, or would you prefer to check a mechanics book first to be sure you're not saying something patently stupid? PD
From: eric gisse on 28 Jun 2010 20:52
...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:12:54 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >>..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >>[...] >> >>> Orbit precession is significantly influenced by the finite speed of >>> gravity. >> >>As you have done many times previously, you make a guess based on the >>existence of something that has not been observed. When asked to make a >>testable prediction, you refuse and say something snide. >> >>Are you going to present your testable prediction, or are you going to say >>something snide? I'm leaning towards 'something snide'. >> >>Dance for me, puppet. > > It should be obvious that, if a force takes time to operate, its direction > of action will vary with relative target speed. > One doesn't have to be a genius to deduce that orbit precession will > result from this. Since you feel it is obvious, where is your derivation for Mercury's perihelion precession? You could undermine relativity pretty nicely if you could do so, wouldn't you agree? That is , of course, assuming you can actually do what you claim and aren't just guessing as you are wont to do. > >>> Henry Wilson... >>> >>> .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative >>> space. > > > Henry Wilson... > > .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space. |