Galilean transformation equations
in [Relativity]
|
From: rbwinn on 15 Jun 2010 23:57 On Jun 15, 8:43 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > [...] > > > Well, every morning I see the sun rise and say, It is a new day. The > > fact that I do this does not diminish my mental capacity. When the > > sun comes up, it actually is a new day where I am. Posting the > > Galilean transformation equations is a similar process. There is > > really no harm in repeating anything that is true. > > So you are autistic. I have been called a lot of things, but you are the first to call me autistic.
From: eric gisse on 16 Jun 2010 04:37 rbwinn wrote: > On Jun 15, 8:43 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> rbwinn wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> > Well, every morning I see the sun rise and say, It is a new day. The >> > fact that I do this does not diminish my mental capacity. When the >> > sun comes up, it actually is a new day where I am. Posting the >> > Galilean transformation equations is a similar process. There is >> > really no harm in repeating anything that is true. >> >> So you are autistic. > > I have been called a lot of things, but you are the first to call me > autistic. If you were not autistic, or a sociopath, you would take a moment to consider why people keep calling you names. The answer is not 'because I'm right'.
From: rbwinn on 16 Jun 2010 05:21 On Jun 16, 1:37 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Jun 15, 8:43 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> rbwinn wrote: > > >> [...] > > >> > Well, every morning I see the sun rise and say, It is a new day. The > >> > fact that I do this does not diminish my mental capacity. When the > >> > sun comes up, it actually is a new day where I am. Posting the > >> > Galilean transformation equations is a similar process. There is > >> > really no harm in repeating anything that is true. > > >> So you are autistic. > > > I have been called a lot of things, but you are the first to call me > > autistic. > > If you were not autistic, or a sociopath, you would take a moment to > consider why people keep calling you names. > > The answer is not 'because I'm right'. If people keep calling me names, it would appear that they are the sociopaths, not me.
From: harald on 16 Jun 2010 05:45 On Jun 15, 11:20 am, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 13, 5:43 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:8b250e8c-7689-460d-83b3-e25bfb5c83e1(a)11g2000prw.googlegroups.com... > > > > On Jun 13, 7:53 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >>news:702e22b2-1bc0-4a16-9f46-3e571612e517(a)z13g2000prh.googlegroups.com... > > > >> > x'=x-vt > > >> > y'=y > > >> > z'=z > > >> > t'=t > > > >> Amazing .. you appear to know what a Galilean transform is. > > > >> > Experiment shows that a clock in moving frame of reference S' is > > >> > slower than a clock in S which shows t > > > >> As measured be S. Hence refuting Galilean transforms > > > >> > According to the Galilean > > >> > transformation equations, that slower clock does not show t'. > > > >> No .. according to Galilean transforms it DOSE show t' = t. And so > > >> Galilean > > >> transforms are wrong > > > >> > Time on > > >> > the slower clock has to be represented by some other variable if the > > >> > Galilean transformation equations are to be used. > > > >> They can't. Because then you are no longer using Galilean transforms > > > >> [snip nonsense that follows] > > > > What do you mean I am no longer using the Galilean transformation > > > equations? > > > > x'=x-vt > > > y'=y > > > z'=z > > > t'=t > > > Because you said you are not using t' = t .. you are using something else. > > So it is no longer a Galilean transform. You can't throw away your cake and > > eat it too. > > > > Which one of the equations is not a Galilean transformation equation? > > I am using t'=t. t is time on a clock in S. t'=t is what is known in > algebra as an identity. t' is time on a clock in S. Time on a clock > in S' is not t'. It has to be shown by some other variable. Here you show that you still do *not* know what a Galilean transformation is. The symbol t' in the Galilean transformation refers to clock time in S'. You can show clock time by some other variable, but then you do not have a Galilean transformation anymore. Harald
From: eric gisse on 16 Jun 2010 16:18
rbwinn wrote: > On Jun 16, 1:37 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> rbwinn wrote: >> > On Jun 15, 8:43 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> rbwinn wrote: >> >> >> [...] >> >> >> > Well, every morning I see the sun rise and say, It is a new day. >> >> > The fact that I do this does not diminish my mental capacity. When >> >> > the sun comes up, it actually is a new day where I am. Posting the >> >> > Galilean transformation equations is a similar process. There is >> >> > really no harm in repeating anything that is true. >> >> >> So you are autistic. >> >> > I have been called a lot of things, but you are the first to call me >> > autistic. >> >> If you were not autistic, or a sociopath, you would take a moment to >> consider why people keep calling you names. >> >> The answer is not 'because I'm right'. > > If people keep calling me names, it would appear that they are the > sociopaths, not me. Thanks for playing. |