From: Tom Rhodes on 21 Jul 2010 21:15 Hey, On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:25:03 -0700 Doug Barton <dougb(a)FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On 07/20/10 16:46, Jos Backus wrote: > > Fwiw, I would much prefer FreeBSD ship with some sort of process supervisor > > a la daemontools. > > That's an interesting idea, but until we have someone willing to > actually do that work we need to deal with what we have. > > I wrote one. It's in the latest status report that, I gues, will be released soon. :) -- Tom Rhodes _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Dominic Fandrey on 23 Jul 2010 04:02 On 17/07/2010 12:56, Ed Schouten wrote: > ... > > This has various implications. The most important one I can think of, is > that the daemon can still do open("/dev/tty", ...) if it wants and spam > your TTY, even if the daemon is running as user `nobody'. This also > means that if you run the rc script from within a pseudo-terminal, it > can never actually destroy the pseudo-terminal for you, because maybe > the daemon is interested in using it. What is not clear to me, in which way is that a problem? Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: lang/perl5.12 segfault (amd64 - 8-STABLE) Next: Port installing localized manual pages. |