From: Kent Wills on 6 Nov 2009 04:53 On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:27:51 -0600, chrisv <chrisv(a)nospam.invalid> wrote: >Kent Wills wrote: > >> Proving or disproving a belief is, at best, difficult. > >As difficult as trimming the groups list? > >Frickin idiots. I didn't trim anything. -- "Kent"
From: Kent Wills on 6 Nov 2009 04:53 On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:44:29 -0600, Lookout <mrLookout(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:24:23 -0600, Kent Wills <compuelf(a)gmail.com> >wrote: > >>On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:30:00 -0500, "krp" <krp21(a)tampabay.rr.com> >>wrote: >> >>> >>>"Uncle Vic" <address(a)withheld.com> wrote in message >>>news:Xns9CB8D0C325710vicman(a)216.196.97.131... >>>> One fine day in alt.atheism, Kadaitcha Man <anon(a)no.email> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Still waiting for you to prove a god exists. >>>>> >>>>> Good. Keep waiting. >>>> >>>> LOL >>> >>> >>>Still waiting on PROOF that he doesn't exist. >> >> You'll never see it. >> One can't prove that any god exists or doesn't exist. People >>either believe a god (or gods) does (do) exist or they believe a god >>(or gods) does not. >> Proving or disproving a belief is, at best, difficult. > >Faith - belief WITHOUT proof. There is no proof of a god. Period. Exactly. It's a belief system. In much the same way atheists believe all gods are fictional, there are people who believe all but one are fictional. Some people believe there are more than one. Hinduism leaps to mind. Outside their pantheon, they will believe all gods are fictional. -- "Kent"
From: Kadaitcha Man on 7 Nov 2009 02:47 Lookout, ye indecent strange serpent, a wonder and a pointing stock to every idle rascal, ye published: > On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:17:28 GMT, Aardvark <aardvark(a)youllnever.know> > wrote: > >> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:11:17 -0600, Lookout wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:21:46 GMT, Aardvark >>> <aardvark(a)youllnever.know> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:03:50 -0600, Lookout wrote: >>>> >>>>>> It's a fair question. Do you have faith that your partner isn't >>>>>> screwing someone else? >>>>> >>>>> Faith has nothing to do with it. I KNOW she isn't. >>>> >>>> So she's handcuffed to you 24/7/365? >>> >>> It's called trust. Just because you couldn't trust your wife doesn't >>> mean all wives aren't like that. >> >> Seems to me that you're a creature of faith. > > Seems to me you are wrong. Synonyms: 1. certainty, belief, faith... http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/trust BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA! -- Ubuntu 9.10 x64 running Windows Server 2008 in VirtualBox 16GB 1333MHz DDR3 RAM, 10 * SATA2 3GB/s HDDs as dual 3TB RAID5 8-thread Intel Extreme i7-975 @ 3.80GHz, air-cooled Thermaltake Intel BoneTrail Motherboard Dual nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS 1GB Honda Sabre 1100cc V-Twin I can wank better than you can. PS: Jensen Interceptor in air-conditioned storage.
From: Kadaitcha Man on 7 Nov 2009 02:48 Lookout, ye boil-brained so and so, thou are now sailed into the north of my ladies opinion, where you will hang like an icicle on a Dutchman's beard, ye enjoined: > On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:40:21 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <anon(a)no.email> > wrote: >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FByERYetqI > > I don't watch youtube vids. Explain it yourself. Having trouble with attributions now, hmmm? Hardly surprising seeing as you can't think. -- Ubuntu 9.10 x64 running Windows Server 2008 in VirtualBox 16GB 1333MHz DDR3 RAM, 10 * SATA2 3GB/s HDDs as dual 3TB RAID5 8-thread Intel Extreme i7-975 @ 3.80GHz, air-cooled Thermaltake Intel BoneTrail Motherboard Dual nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS 1GB Honda Sabre 1100cc V-Twin I can wank better than you can. PS: Jensen Interceptor in air-conditioned storage.
From: Lookout on 7 Nov 2009 10:59
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:48:26 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <anon(a)no.email> wrote: >Lookout, ye boil-brained so and so, thou are now sailed into the north >of my ladies opinion, where you will hang like an icicle on a Dutchman's >beard, ye enjoined: > >> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:40:21 -1200, Kadaitcha Man <anon(a)no.email> >> wrote: > >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FByERYetqI >> >> I don't watch youtube vids. Explain it yourself. > >Having trouble with attributions now, hmmm? Hardly surprising seeing as you >can't think. Not at all. If you can't express then it's you who is lacking, not me. |