Prev: really predicting the masses of elementary particles #569 Correcting Math
Next: More on why the cosmic ray/cloud cover connection is more importantthan greenhouse gases
From: cjcountess on 7 Apr 2010 17:05 I know that people will come with all kinds of names and aliases, and sometimes even the same people with different names and aliases. Sometimes companies and academic establishments will even send out theory assassins, to destroy a new theory that threatens their grants or investment generating ideas. There have even been articles written about this in well known magazines, and so I expect this kind of activity, especially when you know you have a winner like myself. Look sputnik and Igor This greatest discovery of many years, The Geometrical interpretation of E=mc2, the most famous equation in the world, by the most famous scientist, but maybe not for long, explains not only that energy and matter are one, related through conversion factor c2, it shows exactly how energy equals and turns to matter, in the simplest form, so that even a child can understand it, and will immediately surpass you all in knowledge of this, because they will see it as it is, plane, simple, and true. And you all stuck in you rutted minds will go on lingering in those ruts or entrenchments that you have dug in for your futile battle against this truth. So let me state this plain and simple, analogous to a line of 1 inch in the linear direction, (horizontal for instance), x a line of 1 inch in the 90 degree angular or versicle direction, to create a square inch, c2 is c in the linear direction x c in the 90 degree angular direction, which create a 90 degree arc ,which if constant creates a circle and a balance of centripetal and centrifugal forces that create circular and or spherical motion. This is how energy turns to matter at c2, because c2 is not just a mathematical conversion factor, with no physical significance, it is a actual conversion frequency /wavelength where energy turns to matter because it takes on a circular and or spherical motion. Alright, again in 3 step simple terms, c2 is 1)c in the linear direction 2)x c in the 90 degree angular direction 3)creating c in circular motion through a balance of centrifugal and centripetal forces This is where (c2 = c x 2pi = h/2pi and also = G) as G = L/T2 and c2 is the ultimate L/T2, and the point on the EM spectrum, where it is revealed to also be the energy /matter, as well as electromagnetic spectrum because energy attains 1 quantum of gravity rest mass. This is quantum gravity where E=mc2 = F=mv2 as c2 is the ultimate v2 and the same force that compresses energy into matter compresses energy together neglecting like charges repelling each other and overcoming the gravity force which is also geometrically demonstratives. Oh yeah, the (h/2pi) can also be geometrically turned to (h/2pi/2) removing uncertainty principle from the equation as it is shown that c2 is the natural hi end cut of frequency, and both momentum and position, which is inversely proportional to it, can be both measured at same time If energy in circular motion can be cx2pi, with momentum of h/2pi, than if wave makes two rotations at right angle to create a standing spherical wave of spin 2, then momentum is h/2pi/2, and uncertainty about both wavelength and momentum is removed. This lessens renormalization, and running coupling constants, problems, as well as complex dimensional analysis, which saves much processing time memory space and storage space both in human and artificial intelligence. And the hits just keep on coming. There is no way around the evidence Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 7 Apr 2010 17:44 > spherical wave of spin 2, then momentum is h/2pi/2, and uncertainty This should be "spherical wave of spin 1/2" other typos are insignificant, unless that is all my opponents have to work with, why not try to win on technicality? Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 8 Apr 2010 12:38 Al, you are improving, your links are no longer lewd, or pornographic, and I appreciate that. You must know though, that you cannot beat me. I am like the Muhammad Ali of physics, a self taught maverick, who has discovered, and developed, an unbeatable system, of research, and development, of ideas in physics. I am the Black Einstein, the primarily self taught, outside of the box thinker, who is revolutionizing the world of physics, like it, or not. Do you realize how much The Geometrical Interpretation, of this most famous equation ,by the most famous scientist, Albert Einstein, adds to the understanding of physics? Just look at this site, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/expe-text.html ,and I wish someone would get their input on the matter , they all explain that E=mc^2, mean that, energy and matter are equal, and related through conversion factor c^2, but Do not -- Can not, explain how. This is because the explanation is geometrical, and I have added this to the equation. I saw your link on one of your pages to, Mensa, It has to be a joke. I will challenge any one of those guys or gals, to come up with a theory better than mine, that doesn't incorporate mine, while disguising it as there own as well as the guys and gals on the Nova website. Ive read your paper on gravity, and the one on parity, and noticed a change in it sense our first encounter. The Geometrical Interpretation of (E=mc^2 = E=mc^circled) showing that c^2 is a frequency/wavelength, where energy turns to matter, because it takes on a circular and or spherical form, is revolutionary. As a circle, the angular momentum is (h/2pi), and as a sphere, created from the circle, making 2 rotations, at right angles to each other, making it a standing spherical wave, of spin ½, makes the angular momentum (h/ 2pi/2) .. As I stated earlier, this make (c^2 = h/2pi and/or h/2pi/2). Sense Gravity is L/T^2 and c^2 is the ultimate L/T^2, and also the point on EM spectrum, where energy attains rest mass, c^2 also equals 1 quantum of G or gravity rest mass. I have united General Relativity and Quantum Theory to discover Quantum Gravity, and it was so simple, and right under everyones noses. Also, as I stated in last post, although somewhat unclearly, (E=mc^2) = (F=mv^2) at this level, and shows that the same force that compresses energy into matter, pushes matter particles together, neglecting the repelling of particles of like charges, that overcomes the strength of gravity, and is also accounted for in this geometry. Al, your denial of the equivalence principle, will have to get around, or incorporate this. I suspect that this is one of your worries about my theory, is it? What do you think is more important, solving Quantum Gravity, removing the Uncertainty Principle as is currently understood, showing that E, m, L, T, Q, t, G are all unified, and related through conversion factor c^2, just as energy and matter are, or removing the square root of -1, from the realm of the imaginary, into the realm of the real natural unites? I personally like this last one for some reason. I guess because it is nice to bring something out of the realm of the imagination into the realm of reality. It makes you feel creative. But all of the above and more are related and one leads to the other as this idea is producing a wave of discoveries. I am a bad man, Al Conrad J Countess PS. Hey everyone else, I am just messing with Al, because he is so uptight. But seriously, everything I said is true, except that I am not that arrogant. That Muhammad Ali of Physics and The Black Einstein handles might just get me the attention that this theory/discovery deserves though. I just might use them sometimes To GOD goes the glory. To me God is the Universe
From: cjcountess on 8 Apr 2010 12:44 Oh yeah, I was supposed to relate The Geometrical interpretation of (E=mc^2), to the tipping points of change in the macro world, just as it represents the tipping point (quantum leap),on the electromagnetic spectrum, where energy turns to matter. Will prepare something, as it is very IMPORTANT. Conrad J Countess
From: spudnik on 8 Apr 2010 18:53
c^2 is a great constant to work with; how do you feel about C^2 seconds-per-meter^2 ?? actually c times the second-root of two has already been used as a factor, by Weber & in a very elementary exposition (or, it is supposed to be, in German). thnks for the prima donna soto voce; that really means a lot to me ... zzzz. now, I say, "second root" and second-power, because it has nothing in oarticular to do with The Tetragon. (well, may haps, the *skew* tetragon .-) thus: detrend this; all gasses are glass house gasses, but not at the same window of opening or closing. if you're going to use the Farmer's Almanac for a one-year futures, that's fine with me but I don't care!... I, myself etc. can't do the math, except in tripolars ... when I can configure them! --Light: A History! http://wlym.com http://21stcenturysciencetech.com http://white-smoke.wetpaint.com |