Prev: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inlinefunctions
Next: [HACKERS] is this a bug?
From: "Kevin Grittner" on 21 Jan 2010 11:26
Tom Lane <tgl(a)sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner(a)wicourts.gov> writes:
>> So add me to the list of people who think that if
>> these are going to be recurring, we should look at moving from
>> cvs to git as soon as 9.0 is released.
>
> The gating factor is not release schedule; it is the still-
> unaddressed tasks that must be done before we can consider moving.
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Switching_PostgreSQL_from_CVS_to_Git

If you think people can work on that list without risk of delaying
the release, OK. I was assuming that such work would be too
disruptive to work on at this point in a release cycle, and might
possibly pull time from folks who would otherwise be working on the
release. Do you disagree?

-Kevin

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Prev: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inlinefunctions
Next: [HACKERS] is this a bug?