From: Giga2 on
On 19 May, 23:42, Dawlish <pjg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 19, 10:33 am,Giga2<justho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On 18 May, 16:17, "Eric Gisin" <er...(a)nospammail.net> wrote:
>
> > >http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/lindzen_heartland_....
>
> > > Slide show of yesterdays talk at ICCC 2010 by Richard Lindzen. Not powerpoint, lots of information.
>
> > Good stuff. I wonder what name we should accept if not 'sceptic'? He
> > is right I think, it maybe does give too much scientific credence to
> > AGW alarmism.
>
> Denier?

Its good but does have the Holocaust denial overtones as well. Also I
think AGWers ar rapidly becoming the deniers (of reality) so there
would be potential for confusion.
From: Dawlish on
On May 20, 4:12 pm, Giga2 <justho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 19 May, 23:42, Dawlish <pjg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 19, 10:33 am,Giga2<justho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 18 May, 16:17, "Eric Gisin" <er...(a)nospammail.net> wrote:
>
> > > >http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/lindzen_heartland_...
>
> > > > Slide show of yesterdays talk at ICCC 2010 by Richard Lindzen. Not powerpoint, lots of information.
>
> > > Good stuff. I wonder what name we should accept if not 'sceptic'? He
> > > is right I think, it maybe does give too much scientific credence to
> > > AGW alarmism.
>
> > Denier?
>
> Its good but does have the Holocaust denial overtones as well. Also I
> think AGWers ar rapidly becoming the deniers (of reality) so there
> would be potential for confusion.

Only from the point of deniers. Don't be silly about "reality" when
present global temperatures are here. This is the reality:

http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/execute.csh?amsutemps+001
From: Giga2 on
On 20 May, 18:39, Dawlish <pjg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 20, 4:12 pm, Giga2 <justho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 19 May, 23:42, Dawlish <pjg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 19, 10:33 am,Giga2<justho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On 18 May, 16:17, "Eric Gisin" <er...(a)nospammail.net> wrote:
>
> > > > >http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/lindzen_heartland_...
>
> > > > > Slide show of yesterdays talk at ICCC 2010 by Richard Lindzen. Not powerpoint, lots of information.
>
> > > > Good stuff. I wonder what name we should accept if not 'sceptic'? He
> > > > is right I think, it maybe does give too much scientific credence to
> > > > AGW alarmism.
>
> > > Denier?
>
> > Its good but does have the Holocaust denial overtones as well. Also I
> > think AGWers ar rapidly becoming the deniers (of reality) so there
> > would be potential for confusion.
>
> Only from the point of deniers. Don't be silly about "reality" when
> present global temperatures are here. This is the reality:
>
> http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/execute.csh?amsutemps+001

so is this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mxmo9DskYE
From: Benj on
On May 19, 6:42 pm, Dawlish <pjg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> > Good stuff. I wonder what name we should accept if not 'sceptic'? He
> > is right I think, it maybe does give too much scientific credence to
> > AGW alarmism.
>
> Denier?

Yeah. It was refreshing to see Lindzen go after the term "skeptic",
but he didn't have the balls to go after the propaganda term
"denier".

If you ever needed any proof that "climate change" is a POLITICAL
rather than "scientific" issue, the use of the term "denier" to
describe any scientist not blindly supporting Anthropogenic Global
Warming is IT!

From: Benj on
On May 20, 11:12 am, Giga2 <justho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Denier?
>
> Its good but does have the Holocaust denial overtones as well. Also I
> think AGWers ar rapidly becoming the deniers (of reality) so there
> would be potential for confusion.

I'm sure you AGW cultists never noticed the Holocaust "overtones"!

Sure. All innocent as newborn babes!