Prev: The Angeleño Ledger Daily Press
Next: What is the experimentally measurable difference between rest ?mass and the 'relativistic mass' of the photon ??!!
From: Eric Gisin on 18 May 2010 11:17
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/lindzen_heartland_2010.pdf

Slide show of yesterdays talk at ICCC 2010 by Richard Lindzen. Not powerpoint, lots of information.
From: Giga2 on 19 May 2010 05:33
On 18 May, 16:17, "Eric Gisin" <er...(a)nospammail.net> wrote:
> http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/lindzen_heartland_...
>
> Slide show of yesterdays talk at ICCC 2010 by Richard Lindzen. Not powerpoint, lots of information.

Good stuff. I wonder what name we should accept if not 'sceptic'? He
is right I think, it maybe does give too much scientific credence to
AGW alarmism.
From: spudnik on 19 May 2010 18:16
yeah; name on thing that isn't changing,
other than "receding glaciers are bad for whitewater rafting."

thank *you*.

> Good stuff. I wonder what name we should accept if not 'sceptic'? He
> is right I think, it maybe does give too much scientific credence to
> AGW alarmism.

thusNso:
tomorrow is Draw what you like but not that, day.

thank *you*.

> horizontal-axis turbines.

thusNso:
how many infinitessimal dimensions did you
want to fit in this?... is this really a scalar?

thusNso:
real noumbers are all "infinite decimals," iff
you include all of the zeroes, "every" God-am one.

thusNso:
well, that was consoling; now,
I'm ready for the next step ... but
it's a fractal step!

thusNso:
I like all three of those;
note that there is a raw infinity
of trigona, two of whose edges are perpendicular
to the other edge, as far as spherical trig goes,
and I really like those "half lunes."

--y'know dot the surfer's value of pi dot com period semicolon I mean
it!
http://\\:bllz
From: Dawlish on 19 May 2010 18:42
On May 19, 10:33 am, Giga2 <justho...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 18 May, 16:17, "Eric Gisin" <er...(a)nospammail.net> wrote:
>
> >http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/lindzen_heartland_...
>
> > Slide show of yesterdays talk at ICCC 2010 by Richard Lindzen. Not powerpoint, lots of information.
>
> Good stuff. I wonder what name we should accept if not 'sceptic'? He
> is right I think, it maybe does give too much scientific credence to
> AGW alarmism.

Denier?
From: spudnik on 19 May 2010 22:18
actually, receding glaciers are probably better
for rafting, compared to advancing ones, iff
there's more water.

thusNso:
can one tell a priori that a black surface will absorb more
infrared, since it is invisible in the first place, invoking,
perhaps, blackbody curves (and, there are "line spectra"
for both absorption & emmission) ??

I wish folks like Y'know and y'Know would at least *try*
to write their syllogistical theories in terms of,
"There Are No Photons?"

just this afternoon, a lecturer showed a slide
with a graph of "phonons from 0 to over 1 teracycles;"
is that the sound of light?

http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/PhysFAQ/General/LightMill/light-mill.html

thusNso:
I like all three of those;
note that there is a raw infinity
of trigona, two of whose edges are perpendicular
to the other edge, as far as spherical trig goes,
and I really like those "half lunes."

--y'know dot the surfer's value
of pi dot com period semicolon & I mean it!
http://\\:btty
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: The Angeleño Ledger Daily Press
Next: What is the experimentally measurable difference between rest ?mass and the 'relativistic mass' of the photon ??!!