Prev: * * * Why has this been hidden for so long ? ?
Next: An aether orbit around the Sun
From: Eddie Haskell on 6 May 2010 12:01

"Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2010(a)telus.net> wrote in message
news:adf8a31a-c27c-49b0-a99c-7d0c76266538(a)e2g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On May 5, 12:53 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <io...(a)ddvtt.com> wrote:
> "Transition Zone" <mogu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:e10574ad-ef65-455f-a6b3-896cf9b115e7(a)i10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > The Purple Panther wrote:
>
> > Global warming poses twice as great a threat to the planet as has so
> > far been
> > believed, the world's leading scientists have concluded.
>
> Yeah, we're all gonna die. You might as well get it over with now.
>
> -Eddie Haskell

> I'll buy you the gun!

Okay. Make it an Israeli desert eagle.

-Eddie Haskell


From: Transition Zone on 6 May 2010 13:03
On May 5, 2:55 pm, Neolibertarian <cognac...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <e10574ad-ef65-455f-a6b3-896cf9b11...(a)i10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
>  Transition Zone <mogu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The Purple Panther   wrote:
>
> > Global warming poses twice as great a threat to the planet as has so
> > far been
> > believed, the world's leading scientists have concluded.
>
> 1st, you need to check those hard returns.
>
> 2nd, there is no global warming disaster. There never was. There never
> was going to be.
>
> "Question: Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no
> statistically-significant global warming?
>
> "Phil Jones: Yes,

Only one person? That all you have?
From: Transition Zone on 6 May 2010 13:05
On May 5, 4:17 pm, buzz <b...(a)nowhere.com> wrote:
> Transition Zone wrote:
> > The Purple Panther   wrote:
>
> > Global warming poses twice as great a threat to the planet as has so
> > far been
> > believed, the world's leading scientists have concluded.  Meeting in
> > Shanghai,
> > China, they finalised early this week the starkest and most
> > authoritative
> > official warning yet on how the Earth's climate is changing.  The
> > product of
> > three years' work by the 3,000 top experts in the field, the 1,000-
> > page report
> > ends two decades of scientific debate over whether human activities
> > are causing
> > climate change to take place.  It is the most important document yet
> > produced
> > by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the official
> > UN body
> > set up by the world's governments to provide the ultimate scientific
> > judgement
> > on what is happening to the climate, and comes after two less-
> > alarming
> > assessments in 1990 and 1995.
>
> > The scientists conclude that their previous reports gravely
> > underestimated the
> > extent to which the world may heat up and now calculate that it could
> > happen
> > almost twice as fast as they had thought.  Their last report, six
> > years ago,
> > concluded that the world's average temperature would rise by a maximum
> > of 3C by
> > the end of this century.  The new one - which is based on more
> > powerful
> > computer modelling and a better understanding of how the Earth's
> > atmoshere
> > workds - has almost doubled this to 5.8C.  Such an average rise -
> > which would
> > be even greater in temperate areas and at the poles - would certainly
> > melt the
> > Arctic ice-cap and have an enormous and devastating impact on harvests
> > and
> > civilisation.
>
> > The new report also concludes unequivocally for the first time that
> > global
> > warming is taking place and that pollution caused by human activities
> > is to
> > blame.  It reports "new and stronger evidence that most of the
> > observed warming
> > of the last 50 years is attributable to human activities".  In its
> > 1995
> > assessment, the IPCC would go no further than saying that "the balance
> > of
> > evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate".
> > The new
> > report also signals a final acceptance by the world's governments that
> > global
> > warming is happening and is likely to be much worse than expected,
> > since they
> > participate in the IPCC and are the ultimate arbiters of its
> > conclusions.
>
> > Some governments, notably those of the Opec states, continue to deny
> > that
> > global warming is taking place or poses a threat, and they may be
> > joined by the
> > new US administration.  President Bush has repeatedly attacked the
> > global
> > warming negotiations on the grounds that an international agreement to
> > combat
> > global warming would force Americans to "walk to work".
>
> > Why does Bush think that walking to work is such an evil thing?
> > Clinton, his
> > predecessor, seemed to believe that inhaling was wrong (and claimed
> > that he
> > didn't).
> >http://www.network54.com/hide/forum/73876
>
> Is that why Gore purchased a nine million dollar mansion less than two
> miles from the California shore?

So. The mansion would be there, even had he not bought it.
From: Eddie Haskell on 6 May 2010 13:15

"Siobhan Medeiros" <sbm2010(a)telus.net> wrote in message
news:586d69e1-15fa-4747-ae47-d9d41e48de81(a)q32g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On May 5, 11:55 am, Neolibertarian <cognac...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <e10574ad-ef65-455f-a6b3-896cf9b11...(a)i10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
> Transition Zone <mogu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The Purple Panther wrote:
>
> > Global warming poses twice as great a threat to the planet as has so
> > far been
> > believed, the world's leading scientists have concluded.
>
> 1st, you need to check those hard returns.

> Huh?

>
> 2nd, there is no global warming disaster. There never was. There never
> was going to be.
>

> Hmmm...who should I believe...3000 of the world's top scientists...or
> some Usenet rightard who hasn't been right once...Hmmmmm.....

And they are "top" because their governments pay them how much to render a
conclusion that garners them more money and power? Is it that you know that
the GW scam is a corrupt enterprise and are in on it, or is it that you are
simply a dumbass? Stupid or evil?

-Eddie Haskell




From: Neolibertarian on 6 May 2010 20:52
In article
<8ba3d79a-de2b-486c-8e98-5d78d4b150ff(a)p2g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Transition Zone <mogulah(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> On May 5, 2:55�pm, Neolibertarian <cognac...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <e10574ad-ef65-455f-a6b3-896cf9b11...(a)i10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
> > �Transition Zone <mogu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The Purple Panther � wrote:
> >
> > > Global warming poses twice as great a threat to the planet as has so
> > > far been
> > > believed, the world's leading scientists have concluded.
> >
> > 1st, you need to check those hard returns.
> >
> > 2nd, there is no global warming disaster. There never was. There never
> > was going to be.
> >
> > "Question: Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no
> > statistically-significant global warming?
> >
> > "Phil Jones: Yes,
>
> Only one person? That all you have?

I guess you haven't read the emails.

Phil Jones isn't just one person. He's the sine qua non.

--
Neolibertarian

"[The American People] know that we don't have deficits
because people are taxed too little; we have deficits
because big government spends too much."
---Ronald Reagan
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: * * * Why has this been hidden for so long ? ?
Next: An aether orbit around the Sun