Prev: About Interrupt Problem in RHEL-5
Next: Got it working! First post from inside Damn Small Linux! Needmore help pls
From: RayLopez99 on 11 Jun 2010 17:03 On Jun 11, 3:35 pm, jellybean stonerfish <stonerf...(a)geocities.com> wrote: > You can even execute (make run, not make dead) some of your windows > programs on your dsl system, with the 'wine' package. Uh, Jellyfish thanks for the tips, but do you realize I'm running D.S.L. on a Pentium I with very little RAM? Doubt I can use "wine" for emulation of any sort. RL
From: RayLopez99 on 11 Jun 2010 17:06 On Jun 11, 3:54 pm, Mike Easter <Mi...(a)ster.invalid> wrote: > RayLopez99 wrote: > > D.S.L switched my > > mouse buttons--left is now right. > > Riiiggghhht. DSL took a mind of its own. > > There is such a thing as switching a mouse to be left-handed. In my > Mint, I do it with a graphical tool in the Control panel under Mouse -- > but I don't know how to do it with a commandline; and even tho' I have > a DSL running over yonder, I can't see a tool to flip the mouse > handedness with it. > > If I search the net for a command, I see: > > xmodmap -e "pointer = 3 2 1" OK I'll try this, thanks. DSL. > > It seems that you are intentionally trying to 'dis' linux by using > hardware which you don't care enough about to find out what it is or to > improve its ram condition -- and which forces you into using a tiny > linux specialty distro which is very limited in its available > applications and graphical tools. I am working with what I have Mike. I'm not going to buy a Core Intel mP and ruin it by installing Linux. Linux for me is a second hand OS that deserves junk hardware...it's hobbyware. RL
From: J G Miller on 11 Jun 2010 18:09 On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:08:52 -0700, RayLopez99 wrote: > Can't stand it when Linux is shown to be second rate, can you > (im)Poster? So why are you installing what you consider to be a second rate system?
From: RayLopez99 on 12 Jun 2010 04:18 On Jun 12, 1:09 am, J G Miller <mil...(a)yoyo.ORG> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:08:52 -0700, RayLopez99 wrote: > > Can't stand it when Linux is shown to be second rate, can you > > (im)Poster? > > So why are you installing what you consider to be a second rate system? It's for somebody else that's a cheapskate (doesn't upgrade, throw away anything, and doesn't want to pay for a year subscription to an antivirus program like all competent Windows users use). RL
From: RayLopez99 on 12 Jun 2010 04:20
On Jun 12, 1:32 am, William Poaster <wp(a)64-bitBSD&Linuxmachines.com> wrote: operating system. > > Notice too how the troll still replies to me, even though he's been binned for > years. > Notice you're an idiot. The rest of us already did. > > -- > FreeBSD 8.0 64-bit > Kubuntu 10.04 64-bit > Mandriva 2010 64-bit Who cares? You ruined some perfectly fine hardware with the virus- ware called Linux. RL |