Prev: Formal calculus for anything?
Next: Chapter 4 : galactic density and distribution; photons of positrons different than photons of electrons #47; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Jesse F. Hughes on 2 May 2010 23:45
Aiya-Oba <aaiyaoba(a)rcc.mass.edu> writes:

> Thanks Jens Stuckelberger, for your interest in Grivity Is Singularity
> Of Quantum-Continuum.
> Indeed, gravity can be used to prove gravity,because, the ratio of the
> Gravity-Continuum of Space to the Gravity-Quantum,equals the square of
> the Gravity-Continuum.
>
> Hence, Gc divided by 1/Gc = G
>
> Where Gc(0.000008168), is gravity continuum, and 1/G is quantum of Gc.
>
> Such that,
>
> 0.000008168 divided by 1/0.000008168 = 6.672x10^-11
>
> =0.000008168/122428.9912 = 6.672x10^-11
>
> =6.6716224x10^-11 = 6.672X10^-11
>
> =6.672X10^-11 = 6.672X10^-11
> Q E D
> Again, thanks. -Aiya-Oba

Honestly, how can you lecture on critical thinking and still be
incapable of using "such that" in a sensible manner?

I find it hard to believe that you're qualified to teach critical
thinking at a community college, given the incoherent postings we see
here.

--
"Am I am [sic] misanthrope? I would say no, for honestly I never heard
of this word until about 1994 or thereabouts on the Internet reading a
post from someone who called someone a misanthrope."
-- Archimedes Plutonium
From: porky_pig_jr on 3 May 2010 01:32
On May 2, 11:45 pm, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote:

> I find it hard to believe that you're qualified to teach critical
> thinking at a community college, given the incoherent postings we see
> here.
>
it's not just a community college. It's a Roxbury community college. A
crime-ridden drug-infested shithole in the heart of Boston.
From: Aiya-Oba on 3 May 2010 15:48
On May 3, 1:32 am, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com" <porky_pig...(a)my-
deja.com> wrote:
> On May 2, 11:45 pm, "Jesse F. Hughes" <je...(a)phiwumbda.org> wrote:
>
> > I find it hard to believe that you're qualified to teach critical
> > thinking at a community college, given the incoherent postings we see
> > here.
>
> it's not just a community college. It's a Roxbury community college. A
> crime-ridden drug-infested shithole in the heart of Boston.



It's very natural and useful, that many people of this generation by
law of inertial, find it very dificult to understand that beyond the
familiar Relative (apparent and partial) Logic, there exists Absolute
(hidden and unifyiny) Logic, according to which; Oneness of Pair
(equator of self-contradiction), is the ultimate Principle of All in
all- (Spacetime).-Aiya-Oba

From: porky_pig_jr on 3 May 2010 18:50
On May 3, 3:48 pm, Aiya-Oba <aaiya...(a)rcc.mass.edu> wrote:
>
> It's very natural and useful, that many people of this generation by
> law of inertial, find it very dificult to understand that beyond the
> familiar  Relative (apparent and partial) Logic, there exists Absolute
> (hidden and unifyiny) Logic, according to which; Oneness of Pair
> (equator of self-contradiction), is the  ultimate Principle of All in
> all- (Spacetime).-Aiya-Oba

Have you tried to claim that you're Nigerian prince who wants to
transfer gazillion dollars to my account? You would have better luck
with that.
From: Aiya-Oba on 7 May 2010 13:51
On May 3, 6:50 pm, "porky_pig...(a)my-deja.com" <porky_pig...(a)my-
deja.com> wrote:
> On May 3, 3:48 pm, Aiya-Oba <aaiya...(a)rcc.mass.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> > It's very natural and useful, that many people of this generation by
> > law of inertial, find it very dificult to understand that beyond the
> > familiar  Relative (apparent and partial) Logic, there exists Absolute
> > (hidden and unifyiny) Logic, according to which; Oneness of Pair
> > (equator of self-contradiction), is the  ultimate Principle of All in
> > all- (Spacetime).-Aiya-Oba
>
> Have you tried to claim that you're Nigerian prince who wants to
> transfer gazillion dollars to my account? You would have better luck
> with that.




Mudslinging is uncalled-for in the pursuit of the hallowed truth, that
mathematics is celebrated for. -Aiya-Oba

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Formal calculus for anything?
Next: Chapter 4 : galactic density and distribution; photons of positrons different than photons of electrons #47; ATOM TOTALITY