Great Pricelessware
in [Freeware]
|
From: »Q« on 30 Jul 2010 19:50 In <news:Xns9DC4A49AB52BEbearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net>, Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote: > =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote in > news:20100728205247.50116ce6(a)bellgrove.remarqs.net: > > > In <news:Xns9DC2CE2401196bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net>, > > Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote: > > > >> =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote in > >> news:20100727193849.0e193dc7(a)bellgrove.remarqs.net: > >> > >> > In <news:Xns9DC26834262B8bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net>, > >> > Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> This group is for the discussion of freeware and it's > >> >> particular attributes and not anything else, including voting > >> >> for freeware > >> > > >> > Your narrow opinion of what sort of freeware posts are > >> > acceptable in a.c.f is mildly interesting, Bottoms. Calling > >> > your opinion a "fact" won't help you netkop an unmoderated > >> > newsgroup, though. > >> > > >> > More reasonable people recognize a.c.f as a place to make any > >> > sort of freeware post, including ones that lead to the PL. You > >> > haven't forgotten that the PL is a list of freeware, I hope. > > This is alt.comp.freeware. Freeware posts are welcome. > > Websites conducting their forum business in this group is not welcome. Wascally websites! Maybe everybody will just do the discussion and voting to make a great freeware list, then.
From: »Q« on 30 Jul 2010 22:19 In <news:Xns9DC5D30A07688bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net>, Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote: > =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote in > news:20100730185043.356ed631(a)bellgrove.remarqs.net: > > Maybe everybody will just do the discussion and voting to make a > > great freeware list, then. > > > Such has not been wanted as a list for the group, to be maintained by > the group, and within the group as one one developed and was rejected. The fact that you reject the list doesn't mean the PL isn't wanted. > Such a list and discussion kinda go hand in hand for this group...as > a record of what the group generally feels are the best programs to > keep on the list. Almost all your suggestions to improve the list are unhelpful, but at least you sometimes understand the spirit of it. > and maintaining working links. You mean posting links to the group, right? Coz it makes some people crazy if the links are maintained on websites.
From: »Q« on 31 Jul 2010 21:51 a remailer spewed: > I'll explain: Virtually every Pricelessware groupy peddles the > notion that PWH is an integral (even necessary!) part of ACF On the contrary, the notion that a website is an integral or necessary part of ACF is only a straw man set up sometimes by Bottoms and hummingbird so they can demolish it again. You're even more confused than most remailer users who take a stab at reading Google's archives.
From: »Q« on 1 Aug 2010 00:36 In <news:Xns9DC5DFE59F6C1bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net>, Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote: > =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote in > news:20100730211920.41c576f0(a)bellgrove.remarqs.net: > > > In <news:Xns9DC5D30A07688bearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net>, > > Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote: > >> Such a list and discussion kinda go hand in hand for this > >> group...as a record of what the group generally feels are the best > >> programs to keep on the list. > > > > Almost all your suggestions to improve the list are unhelpful, but > > at least you sometimes understand the spirit of it. > > > >> and maintaining working links. > > > > You mean posting links to the group, right? Coz it makes some > > people crazy if the links are maintained on websites. > > You know what. Yep. > You are playing a little boys game That's why we're tagging this stuff [BB] -- do you think [LB] would be clearer? I thought [BB] was a reasonable convention, since so many people call you that and you don't object to being called that. > and you change the context of the discussion. Not at all; the context remains your hatred of the alleged cult and your very entertaining fantasy about how you came to declare war on these figments of your imagination. It's fun stuff to chat about, isn't it? > I have three people in my kill file. Twice you've claimed to killfile me. Am I two of the three? Is Warner the other one on your list? > I now have four. Who'd you killfile now? Warner will just die if you put him on the list twice, you know.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: {_} Re: The Great $Pricelessware $Racket Next: [UPDATE] Calibre v0.7.10 |