Prev: {_} Re: The Great $Pricelessware $Racket
Next: [UPDATE] Calibre v0.7.10
From: »Q« on 27 Jul 2010 00:21
In <news:i2gfvq$joo$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
Craig <netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:

> Does anyone remember when pricelessware was something valued in this
> group? Does anyone want it to continue?

I think if there's someone to take point (you? BeAr? who else?) plenty
of people would still want to participate constructively.

If that happens, it might help anyone who cares about the PL to block
posts from the remailers, which are being abused to keep the noise
level so high here.
From: John Corliss on 27 Jul 2010 05:44
�Q� wrote:
> Craig wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone remember when pricelessware was something valued in this
>> group? Does anyone want it to continue?
>
> I think if there's someone to take point (you? BeAr? who else?) plenty
> of people would still want to participate constructively.
>
> If that happens, it might help anyone who cares about the PL to block
> posts from the remailers, which are being abused to keep the noise
> level so high here.

I just added a filter for dizum in Thunderbird. To do this, I added a
new header category, "Path". This new filter should be extremely effective.

IMO, TB is now far better at filtering than nFilter ever was.

--
John Corliss BS206. Because of all the Googlespam, I block all posts
sent through Google Groups. I also block as many posts from anonymous
remailers (for example, usenet4all.se, x-privat.org, dizum.com,
tioat.net, frell.theremailer.net) as possible due to forgeries posted
through them.

No ad, CD, commercial, cripple, demo, nag, share, spy, time-limited,
trial or web wares OR warez for me, please.
From: Craig on 27 Jul 2010 08:46
On 07/27/2010 02:44 AM, John Corliss wrote:
> �Q� wrote:
....
> I just added a filter for dizum in Thunderbird. To do this, I added a
> new header category, "Path". This new filter should be extremely effective.
>
> IMO, TB is now far better at filtering than nFilter ever was.

Thanks for the reminder John.

--
-Craig
From: David W on 27 Jul 2010 10:41
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:21:54 +0100, =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?=
wrote:

> In <news:i2gfvq$joo$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
> Craig <netburgher(a)REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone remember when pricelessware was something
>> valued in this group? Does anyone want it to continue?
>
> I think if there's someone to take point (you? BeAr? who
> else?) plenty of people would still want to participate
> constructively.
>
> If that happens, it might help anyone who cares about the
> PL to block posts from the remailers, which are being
> abused to keep the noise level so high here.

Don't even think about it. You didn't manage it before.

--
http://www.mologogo.com/
From: »Q« on 27 Jul 2010 20:24
In <news:Xns9DC240A0CBFBbearbottoms1gmaicom(a)news.albasani.net>,
Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1(a)gmai.com> wrote:

> =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= <boxcars(a)gmx.net> wrote in
> news:20100726232154.3b0118e4(a)bellgrove.remarqs.net:
>
> > If that happens, it might help anyone who cares about the PL to
> > block posts from the remailers, which are being abused to keep the
> > noise level so high here.
>
> Such website business should be conducted in it's own forum.

Blocking Bottoms may help too, though he tends to generate more noise
when the nature of the Pricelessware List is being discussed and less
when a.c.f is actually working on producing the list.



 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: {_} Re: The Great $Pricelessware $Racket
Next: [UPDATE] Calibre v0.7.10