Prev: ECPG check variables hidden by locals v2
Next: debugger question
From: Bruce Momjian on 12 Apr 2010 21:28
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 22:12 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > >
> > > How about we call it "exclusivity constraints".
> > >
> > > Not much of a change, but helps to differentiate.
> >
> > Well, the keyword is EXCLUDE so we could call it "EXCLUDE contraints".
>
> If that is the keyword then that is what people will use, agreed.
>
> That is poor English, but I think we can reword the sentences to allow
> that phrase to make sense.
>
> e.g. Added capability for EXCLUDE constraints.

I have modified the documentation with the attached patch to call this
new features "exclude constraints". Is this what everyone wants?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: ECPG check variables hidden by locals v2
Next: debugger question