Prev: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3
Next: do we need to postpone beta4?
From: Robert Haas on 27 Jul 2010 14:04
I think we should consider postponing beta4. I count eleven
non-documentation, 9.0-specific bug fix on REL9_0_STABLE, but there
are currently five items on the open 9.0 issues list, at least one of
which appears to be a new bug in 9.0, and we just got a bug report on
pgsql-bugs from Valentine Gogichashvili complaining of what looks to
be a crasher in the redo path for heap_xlog_update(). It seems
unlikely at this point that we can have all of these issues fixed and
still have time for a full buildfarm cycle before the wrap. Does it
make sense to put out a beta with known bugs (presumably requiring
another beta) at this point, or should we push this off a bit?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3
Next: do we need to postpone beta4?