From: siljaline on 18 May 2010 14:32 I was generally understood per the FAQ, that HJT Logs would not be supported here. Visit your friendly HJT Log Forum(s) Silj -- "Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time." - Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
From: PajaP on 18 May 2010 15:31 On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:32:52 -0400, "siljaline" <spam(a)uce.gov> wrote: >I was generally understood per the FAQ, that HJT Logs would not be supported here. I thought this was because most of the regulars do not understand how to interpret them. Maybe some smart people now read this group. LOL.
From: David H. Lipman on 18 May 2010 16:59 From: "PajaP" <pajap(a)news-only.co.uk.invalid> | On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:32:52 -0400, "siljaline" <spam(a)uce.gov> wrote: >>I was generally understood per the FAQ, that HJT Logs would not be supported here. | I thought this was because most of the regulars do not understand how to | interpret them. Maybe some smart people now read this group. LOL. It is not supprted in any quality Usenet news group! -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: PajaP on 18 May 2010 17:15 On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:59:14 -0400, "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote: >From: "PajaP" <pajap(a)news-only.co.uk.invalid> > >| On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:32:52 -0400, "siljaline" <spam(a)uce.gov> wrote: > >>>I was generally understood per the FAQ, that HJT Logs would not be supported here. > >| I thought this was because most of the regulars do not understand how to >| interpret them. Maybe some smart people now read this group. LOL. > >It is not supprted in any quality Usenet news group! Neither are OT posts glorifying drug use but that does not stop you!
|
Pages: 1 Prev: HJT log entry - query Next: A Psychological Portrait of Raid/Dustin Cook The Sociopath |