From: siljaline on
I was generally understood per the FAQ, that HJT Logs would not be supported here.

Visit your friendly HJT Log Forum(s)

Silj

--
"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_

From: PajaP on
On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:32:52 -0400, "siljaline" <spam(a)uce.gov> wrote:

>I was generally understood per the FAQ, that HJT Logs would not be supported here.

I thought this was because most of the regulars do not understand how to
interpret them. Maybe some smart people now read this group. LOL.
From: David H. Lipman on
From: "PajaP" <pajap(a)news-only.co.uk.invalid>

| On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:32:52 -0400, "siljaline" <spam(a)uce.gov> wrote:

>>I was generally understood per the FAQ, that HJT Logs would not be supported here.

| I thought this was because most of the regulars do not understand how to
| interpret them. Maybe some smart people now read this group. LOL.

It is not supprted in any quality Usenet news group!

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


From: PajaP on
On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:59:14 -0400, "David H. Lipman"
<DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:

>From: "PajaP" <pajap(a)news-only.co.uk.invalid>
>
>| On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:32:52 -0400, "siljaline" <spam(a)uce.gov> wrote:
>
>>>I was generally understood per the FAQ, that HJT Logs would not be supported here.
>
>| I thought this was because most of the regulars do not understand how to
>| interpret them. Maybe some smart people now read this group. LOL.
>
>It is not supprted in any quality Usenet news group!

Neither are OT posts glorifying drug use but that does not stop you!