Harbour 2.0 released
in [Visual Objects]
|
Prev: SMALL SAMPLE - FabZip
Next: Dynamic memory Low
From: Geoff Schaller on 27 Dec 2009 19:38 I think that is my point. Harbour would take us back almost a decade in capability. Geoff "Rene J. Pajaron" <rjpajaron(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:b273c9d1-2abb-4767-8ac9-bc7284bd3729(a)z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com: > Geoff, > > A quick look at harbor project websites. > > It tells that it is a cross platform application development. > > Other than that, there is nothing special. > > This is not for me. > > Rene
From: Alessandro Antonangeli on 28 Dec 2009 06:17 Il Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:38:50 +0000, Geoff Schaller ha scritto: > I think that is my point. > > Harbour would take us back almost a decade in capability. > > Geoff > > > > "Rene J. Pajaron" <rjpajaron(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:b273c9d1-2abb-4767-8ac9-bc7284bd3729(a)z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com: > >> Geoff, >> >> A quick look at harbor project websites. >> >> It tells that it is a cross platform application development. >> >> Other than that, there is nothing special. >> >> This is not for me. >> >> Rene Hi I've just took a glance to xHarbour It seems better than VO: better IDE better language sintax alive and not dead as VO no 100$ for bug fix On what basis you say that it is a back step? -- Ciao Alessandro
From: Geoff Schaller on 28 Dec 2009 15:54 Let me see... Language capability API flexibility SDK level of support OLE VO2Ado bBrowser Support (in the form of conference samples and white papers) Classes... "Alessandro Antonangeli" <alcati.r3m0v3th1s(a)alcati.com> wrote in message news:hha44j$j44$1(a)speranza.aioe.org: > Il Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:38:50 +0000, Geoff Schaller ha scritto: > > > > I think that is my point. > > > > Harbour would take us back almost a decade in capability. > > > > Geoff > > > > > > > > "Rene J. Pajaron" <rjpajaron(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:b273c9d1-2abb-4767-8ac9-bc7284bd3729(a)z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com: > > > > >> Geoff, > >> > >> A quick look at harbor project websites. > >> > >> It tells that it is a cross platform application development. > >> > >> Other than that, there is nothing special. > >> > >> This is not for me. > >> > >> Rene > > > Hi > > I've just took a glance to xHarbour > It seems better than VO: > better IDE > better language sintax > alive and not dead as VO > no 100$ for bug fix > > On what basis you say that it is a back step? > > -- > Ciao Alessandro
From: Marc Verkade [Marti IT] on 28 Dec 2009 17:31 You forget the migration capabilities to Vulcan! -- Grtz, Marc "Geoff Schaller" <geoffx(a)softxwareobjectives.com.au> schreef in bericht news:iW8_m.65285$ze1.45956(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au... > Let me see... > > Language capability > API flexibility > SDK level of support > OLE > VO2Ado > bBrowser > Support (in the form of conference samples and white papers) > Classes... > > > > > > "Alessandro Antonangeli" <alcati.r3m0v3th1s(a)alcati.com> wrote in message > news:hha44j$j44$1(a)speranza.aioe.org: > >> Il Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:38:50 +0000, Geoff Schaller ha scritto: >> >> >> > I think that is my point. >> > >> > Harbour would take us back almost a decade in capability. >> > >> > Geoff >> > >> > >> > >> > "Rene J. Pajaron" <rjpajaron(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> > news:b273c9d1-2abb-4767-8ac9-bc7284bd3729(a)z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com: >> > >> >> >> Geoff, >> >> >> >> A quick look at harbor project websites. >> >> >> >> It tells that it is a cross platform application development. >> >> >> >> Other than that, there is nothing special. >> >> >> >> This is not for me. >> >> >> >> Rene >> >> >> Hi >> >> I've just took a glance to xHarbour >> It seems better than VO: >> better IDE >> better language sintax >> alive and not dead as VO >> no 100$ for bug fix >> >> On what basis you say that it is a back step? >> >> -- >> Ciao Alessandro >
From: Geoff Schaller on 28 Dec 2009 19:36
<rofl> Yes, I'll give you that but I suspect the harbour purist hasn't thought down to Dot Net.... "Marc Verkade [Marti IT]" <marcatM(a)rtidotnl> wrote in message news:4b393571$0$778$58c7af7e(a)news.kabelfoon.nl: > You forget the migration capabilities to Vulcan! > > -- > Grtz, Marc > > > "Geoff Schaller" <geoffx(a)softxwareobjectives.com.au> schreef in bericht > news:iW8_m.65285$ze1.45956(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au... > > > Let me see... > > > > Language capability > > API flexibility > > SDK level of support > > OLE > > VO2Ado > > bBrowser > > Support (in the form of conference samples and white papers) > > Classes... > > > > > > > > > > > > "Alessandro Antonangeli" <alcati.r3m0v3th1s(a)alcati.com> wrote in message > > news:hha44j$j44$1(a)speranza.aioe.org: > > > > >> Il Mon, 28 Dec 2009 00:38:50 +0000, Geoff Schaller ha scritto: > >> > >> > > >> > I think that is my point. > >> > > >> > Harbour would take us back almost a decade in capability. > >> > > >> > Geoff > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > "Rene J. Pajaron" <rjpajaron(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >> > news:b273c9d1-2abb-4767-8ac9-bc7284bd3729(a)z4g2000prh.googlegroups.com: > >> > > >> > > >> >> Geoff, > >> >> > >> >> A quick look at harbor project websites. > >> >> > >> >> It tells that it is a cross platform application development. > >> >> > >> >> Other than that, there is nothing special. > >> >> > >> >> This is not for me. > >> >> > >> >> Rene > >> > >> > > >> Hi > >> > >> I've just took a glance to xHarbour > >> It seems better than VO: > >> better IDE > >> better language sintax > >> alive and not dead as VO > >> no 100$ for bug fix > >> > >> On what basis you say that it is a back step? > >> > >> -- > >> Ciao Alessandro > > > |