Prev: See how Time Inc. controls your brain <sic>
Next: Calculation of Soldner
From: Man_of_Mind on 31 Jul 2010 12:49
On 7/25/2010 7:29 PM, kdthrge(a)yahoo.com wrote:
>
> On Jul 25, 1:02 am, gordo replied:
--
>> Its not quite that easy.The stupid,the ignorant and the insane we
>> cannot do much with but the shills are being exposed and we cannot
>> wait 10 years.Name one scientist who disputes that the globe has been
>> warming and that the last 10 years have been the warmest since
>> measurements were taken.-
>
> Bullshit. Inhofe in the senate minority report gathered submissions
> from several hundred of the highest level of accredited scientists

Inhofe doesn't have any qualifications (or scruples) to begin
to 'qualify' his "submissions" for anything but the usual dreck..

--How's that 'gas law' equation of your doing? Still not published?
From: Man_of_Mind on 31 Jul 2010 12:53
On 7/30/2010 4:35 PM, kdthrge(a)yahoo.com whined impotently:
>
> On Jul 25, 10:18 pm, gordo<grmerr...(a)shaw.ca.remove> replied:
--
>> .Name one scientist who disputes that the globe has been
>> warming and that the last 10 years have been the warmest since
>> measurements were taken.-
>> You use a lot of foul language which really is not in my English
>> dictionary.Now who is the scientist?-
>
> Trenberth is one,

Nope, you're again selectively misquoting his published works..

> although this is only in the stolen emails.

Nope, your "say-so" is utterly without merit..

Example follows..

> The proxies show a decline in the 20th century

Nope, you're still incapable of citing a peer-reviewed study
and have again resorted to a completely discredited conjecture..

--Which highlights your abject lack of academic credentials..
From: spudnik on 1 Aug 2010 22:32
so, are they pushing cap&trade in the "BP punishment bill,"
or not?... y'know, I'm sure that
both Waxman and Obama are very sincere about AGW, or GW, or
about the Dubyas, and it is just the same as H-Dubya and Gore's
Kyoto cap&trade, as well as Waxman's Acid Rain cap&trade.

so.

> If the EPA and Obama wish to impose this by fiat, they can take all
> responsiblility for their actions. It is their perogative to assume
> and rely on the validity of their science as they proceed with their
> malicious act of aggression against the US.

thus: to belabor the obvious,
what is Earth's largest conspiracy per etymology?... anyway,
did the hackers come forth?
> Unless, of course, it's all a giant conspiracy . . .

<deletia impletum>
I thought, "stupid seats" was a Britishism, and it seems that
someone else references "The Wall," "Oliver!," and
Harry Potter PS#1, Oxford (from the 12th cce, and
a slightly different institutional affiliation .-)

thus: just read that the amount of stimulus/renewable funds goes
monumentally toward foreign firms, as is certainly clear
from the Solar Santa Monica programme, but
this was particualrly relating to wind, with only GE and
some other USA firm remaining in the market.
of course, oil isn't fossils!
http://www.powertochoose.org/_content/_compare/compare.aspx

thus: d'y'think, Dubya believed every lie that Cheeny told him,
such as the idea that cap&trade is not "free-er trade;" perhaps,
he actually knew it, and was going against his training at MIT.
look at the book, _102 Minutes_, which seems to answer many
of the concerns of the Truthers in a blow-by-blow account
of the rescue.
> You believe every lie Bush and Cheney have told; don't you?

thus: if you are on a train & you look out of it
from the engine, toward the station at night,
both the sounds & the light eminating from the station
will be blueshifted per the velocity of the train & yourself,
wondering about the math of the psychedelic experienced ... me,
three, with or without LSD.
> how can Doppler have anything to do with relativity?

thus quoth:
    I used electrical engineer language to describe the four
polarization states of the electromagnetic field inside an antenna.
Let me use covariant QED language.
    The two circular polarization states are unchanged in QED
language. Clockwise and counterclockwise are good words. However, the
transverse magnetic mode is called the longitudinal spin state. The
transverse electric mode is called the time-like spin state.
       To summarize: I described a good heuristic relating QED to
classical antenna theory. The spin state of the photon relates to the
polarization state of the radio wave or radio field. There are two
polarization/spin states in the far field (far from the antennae) and
four polarization/spin states in the near field (close to the
antennae).

thus: the pythagorean theorem is perfectly dimensional, as
he and I both concern ourselves with "circling," instead
of "tatragoning." that is, "Einstein's proof" via similarity,
which he probably found at the gymnasium
in Euclid, is merely diagrammatic as he gave it;
the actual construction *is* the lunes proof
(Hippocrates', I think, but different than the Oath's .-)
> So why are you assuming otherwise?

thus: in spite of his slogan about phase-space,
Minkowski was a fantastic Nd geometer. anyway,
it's downright innumerate to worry about it,
without actually peeking at l'OEuvre de Fermatttt, but
Hipparchus' (or Hippocrates') lunes proof is all
that you need for the dimensionality of the 2d pythag. thm.,
if not the 3d pair of them (quadruplets).
the main thing, though, is that Fermat didn't have
to prove n=3, since his proof apparently applied
to all of the odd primes; only the special case
of n=4 does not fall to teh well-known lemma
for composite exponents, and this he showed,
in one of his rare expositions.

thus: too bad, the unit associated with the pound, had
to be associated with The newton -- the plagiarist,
the spook, the freemason, the corpuscular "theorist" ...

--les ducs d'oil!
http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biograph...

--Light, A History!
http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html
From: kdthrge on 2 Aug 2010 00:07
On Jul 31, 11:49 am, Man_of_Mind <baron.von.m...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/25/2010 7:29 PM, kdth...(a)yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 25, 1:02 am, gordo replied:
> --
> >> Its not quite that easy.The stupid,the ignorant and the insane we
> >> cannot do much with but the shills are being exposed and we cannot
> >> wait 10 years.Name one scientist who disputes that the globe has been
> >> warming and that the last 10 years have been the warmest since
> >> measurements were taken.-
>
> > Bullshit. Inhofe in the senate minority report gathered submissions
> > from several hundred of the highest level of accredited scientists
>
> Inhofe doesn't have any qualifications (or scruples) to begin
> to 'qualify' his "submissions" for anything but the usual dreck..
>

The submissions Inhofe recieved are undoubtly from fully accredited
scientists.

So you are saying that the way it is in the 'scientific' world, that
these 400 or 500 people with full accreditation and standing are
bonkers and that is just the way it is in the 'scienitific' world?

A common and accepted thing that sheer charlatans and liars also have
full accreditation?

No way to tell from just the fact that someone has perfect and
credible accreditation if they actually have any scientific or
objective capabilities and could very well be a spy for Exxon and, by
the invention and purveying of their falsified science created to
demean the holy writ of AGW which is intent upon the holy mission to
save the world by the holy word that CO2 absorbs IR, working only to
fill their pockets with gold upon the demise of the ordinary person by
serving and enabling their insatiable lust and addiction to the evil
and dirty carbon fuels?

You have a point about the GDamn value of just believing in what
someone says merely because of the cute little piece of paper they
earned and payed for down at the local school yard.

KD
From: kdthrge on 7 Aug 2010 13:37
On Aug 1, 11:07 pm, "kdth...(a)yahoo.com" <kdth...(a)earthlink.net> wrote:

>
> A common and accepted thing that sheer charlatans and liars also have
> full accreditation?
>
> No way to tell from just the fact that someone has perfect and
> credible accreditation if they actually have any scientific or
> objective capabilities and could very well be a spy for Exxon and, by
> the invention and purveying of their falsified science created to
> demean the holy writ of AGW which is intent upon the holy mission to
> save the world by the holy word that CO2 absorbs IR, working only to
> fill their pockets with gold upon the demise of the ordinary person by
> serving and enabling their insatiable lust and addiction to the evil
> and dirty carbon fuels?
>
> You have a point about the GDamn value of just believing in what
> someone says merely because of the cute little piece of paper they
> earned and payed for down at the local school yard.
>

No binding accord reached at Copenhagen.

No passage of climate legislation in the US Congress this year.

No mandates in the energy bill for renewables in the production of
electricity.

The insane movement to apply taxation to the point of strangulation
for some completely impossible goal of mitigating global warming is
DEAD, although it may still live in the imaginings of the academics
who were never really concerned with facts or the truth anyway.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhAHAHAHhahahahahHAHAHA

KD
The ship of fools of the BELIEVERS in anthropogenic global warming
sails on,,,

HAHAHAHhahahahahahHAHAHAHAHhahahahaha

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: See how Time Inc. controls your brain <sic>
Next: Calculation of Soldner