Prev: See how Time Inc. controls your brain <sic>
Next: Calculation of Soldner
From: Man_of_Mind on 9 Aug 2010 08:40
On 8/1/2010 11:07 PM, Kent Deatherage <kdthrge(a)yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Jul 31, 11:49 am, Man_of_Mind pointed out the obvious missed upon:
>>
>> On 7/25/2010 7:29 PM, Kent Deatherage <kdthrge(a)yahoo.com> whined:
>>>
>>> On Jul 25, 1:02 am, gordo replied:
----
>>>> Its not quite that easy.The stupid,the ignorant and the insane we
>>>> cannot do much with but the shills are being exposed and we cannot
>>>> wait 10 years.Name one scientist who disputes that the globe has been
>>>> warming and that the last 10 years have been the warmest since
>>>> measurements were taken.-
>>>
>>> Bullshit. Inhofe in the senate minority report gathered submissions
>>> from several hundred of the highest level of accredited scientists
>>
>> Inhofe doesn't have any qualifications (or scruples) to begin
>> to 'qualify' his "submissions" for anything but the usual dreck..
>>
>> --How's that 'gas law' equation of your doing? Still not published?
>
> The submissions Inhofe recieved are undoubtly

There's plenty to doubt about the 'submissions' Inhofe has received..

Why do you have to pretend such deliberately false 'absolutes'?

--Or, were you just displaying your usual right-wing zealotry again?
From: Man_of_Mind on 9 Aug 2010 08:53
On 8/1/2010 9:23 PM, Kent Deatherage <kdthrge(a)yahoo.com> whined:
>
> On Jul 31, 11:49 am, Man_of_Mind refuted:
>>
>> On 7/25/2010 7:29 PM, Kent Deatherage <kdthrge(a)yahoo.com> whined:
>>>
>>> On Jul 25, 1:02 am, gordo replied:
----
>>>> Its not quite that easy.The stupid,the ignorant and the insane we
>>>> cannot do much with but the shills are being exposed and we cannot
>>>> wait 10 years.Name one scientist who disputes that the globe has been
>>>> warming and that the last 10 years have been the warmest since
>>>> measurements were taken.-
>>>
>>> Bullshit. Inhofe in the senate minority report gathered submissions
>>> from several hundred of the highest level of accredited scientists
>>
>> Inhofe doesn't have any qualifications (or scruples) to begin
>> to 'qualify' his "submissions" for anything but the usual dreck..
>
> He obviously has the qualifications

Nope, you're insinuating something that isn't a proven scientific fact,
and all the innuendo and sloganeering on your lame behalf isn't going
to change scientific facts, Kent..

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/28/inhofe-diatribe/

--How's that 'gas law' equation of your doing? Still not published?
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: See how Time Inc. controls your brain <sic>
Next: Calculation of Soldner