Prev: Ricoh GXR; Nice with APS, sucky with TINY P&S sensor
Next: Canon 5D II firmware update - audio bug
From: Mr. Strat on 18 Mar 2010 22:38 In article <pKidnY0Vcfv6DTzWnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, rdoc <beep(a)this.net> wrote: > ...one of those hokey-looking bulb shutter release hose deals? You know the > ones that use a pump of air to depress the shutter button. Are they legit to > any degree, ie... can you get a half depression then the full? I used one in the studio for 16 1/2 years...on an RB and on a Hasselblad.
From: Tzortzakakis Dimitrios on 19 Mar 2010 12:55 ? "rwalker" <rwalker(a)despammed.com> ?????? ??? ?????? news:1mc5q51aajvpm18sl3b3l6rvn6qe372voe(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:08:04 -0400, Bowser <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote: > >>I think so, but I've never heard the official name for those threads. >>They're the usual cone-chaped threads in the middle of the shutter >>release. I haven't seen them in quite a while. Of course, my old >>yashica Mat 124G has them. But who shoots film? > > I do. I still use my cable release with my Pentax 67s, my Yashica D, > and my Nikon FG20 when I dust it off about once a year. I bought off the "comrades" (ex-Soviet citizens woth greek ancestry), a cable release, a mains-powered flash, an exposure meter (selenium), a small tripod, a tripod on a vice, for my Nikon FM-2, a Zenit, complete with wide-angle and telephoto, and a twin lens reflex, all soviet made. Now all gone, being given away. I still have got a cheese cutter, and a slide projector, and some records, and some tools. -- Tzortzakakis Dimitrios major in electrical engineering mechanized infantry reservist hordad AT otenet DOT gr
From: Dave Cohen on 24 Mar 2010 10:20 On 3/18/2010 10:38 PM, Mr. Strat wrote: > In article<pKidnY0Vcfv6DTzWnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, rdoc > <beep(a)this.net> wrote: > >> ...one of those hokey-looking bulb shutter release hose deals? You know the >> ones that use a pump of air to depress the shutter button. Are they legit to >> any degree, ie... can you get a half depression then the full? > > I used one in the studio for 16 1/2 years...on an RB and on a > Hasselblad. They were very popular in the very old days with plate and field cameras etc. Indeed, isn't the shutter nomenclature 'bulb' derived from this form of release. As I recall, you would squeeze the bulb, hold while counting then release to obtain long exposures.
From: Allen on 24 Mar 2010 14:08 Dave Cohen wrote: > On 3/18/2010 10:38 PM, Mr. Strat wrote: >> In article<pKidnY0Vcfv6DTzWnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, rdoc >> <beep(a)this.net> wrote: >> >>> ...one of those hokey-looking bulb shutter release hose deals? You >>> know the >>> ones that use a pump of air to depress the shutter button. Are they >>> legit to >>> any degree, ie... can you get a half depression then the full? >> >> I used one in the studio for 16 1/2 years...on an RB and on a >> Hasselblad. > > They were very popular in the very old days with plate and field cameras > etc. Indeed, isn't the shutter nomenclature 'bulb' derived from this > form of release. As I recall, you would squeeze the bulb, hold while > counting then release to obtain long exposures. Correct on all counts. I remember back in 1935, age 6, the top local portrait photographer in my town used one while taking my picture. The only plate/cut film cameras with viewfinders were press cameras (i.e., Speed Graphic and Busch). Allen
From: Floyd L. Davidson on 24 Mar 2010 23:56 Dave Cohen <user(a)example.net> wrote: >On 3/18/2010 10:38 PM, Mr. Strat wrote: >> In article<pKidnY0Vcfv6DTzWnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d(a)giganews.com>, rdoc >> <beep(a)this.net> wrote: >> >>> ...one of those hokey-looking bulb shutter release hose deals? You know the >>> ones that use a pump of air to depress the shutter button. Are they legit to >>> any degree, ie... can you get a half depression then the full? >> >> I used one in the studio for 16 1/2 years...on an RB and on a >> Hasselblad. > >They were very popular in the very old days with plate and field cameras >etc. Indeed, isn't the shutter nomenclature 'bulb' derived from this >form of release. As I recall, you would squeeze the bulb, hold while >counting then release to obtain long exposures. The "bulb" term is reference to shooting with a flash bulb for light rather than using a powder charge for light... all dating to the 1930's. Previously, with the powder charge, they just removed the lens cap and the proceeded to light off the powder charge, a process that could take a few seconds time. The new fangled flash bulbs that were invented about 1930 were easier to use with a shutter release that kept the shutter open manually for only the second or two that was required to fire off the flash bulb. Later of course the idea of a synchronized shutter/flash trigger was invented, and just a long enough exposure time could be selected. And that became shorter as the actual duration of the flash decreased. The air bulb shutter release had nothing to do with that particular terminology. It just happened to be the most reasonable way to have a relatively long (more than a foot or two) shutter release cable. A steel cable in a flexible tube worked fine for short releases, but was not practical a 20-30 feet that worked easily with the air bulb. -- Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd(a)apaflo.com
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Ricoh GXR; Nice with APS, sucky with TINY P&S sensor Next: Canon 5D II firmware update - audio bug |