From: J. P. Gilliver (John) on 21 Jan 2010 19:05 In message <OUx7uMkmKHA.1708(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, Ted Curtin <tjcurtin1(a)verizon.net> writes: >No, I have SP2, but I think this was downloaded in response to some software >that I installed... BTW, what's the latest take on SP3? I avoided it at >release when I heard about the many difficulties that people had with it, >and saw it suggested to avoid it - SP2 is working fine for me, should I >leave well enough alone? FWIW, This machine - which _came_ with SP3 - hasn't given me much trouble so far. But no-one can say whether you should install SP3 or not: look at the benefits SP3 is supposed to give (added functionality, security matters) and decide if they are significant to you. I think the reports of SP3's problems have died off, and in general it is a good thing. As long as you're not overly concerned by the (alleged) increased DRM, I'd say it's probably better on balance to have it than not. But that's just my opinion. [] -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar(a)T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf ** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for ludicrously outdated thoughts on PCs. ** "Anything else you'd like me to do while I'm at it? Paint the sky green? Bury the odd elephant I find lying around ..." - Tidy, the Android - Earthsearch II, part 2. (1982-5-2)
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: l_intl.nls file corrupted on XP Home Next: DVD Not Reading in XP Home |