From: Ted Curtin on
Since automatic update downloaded the 'HID Non-User Input Data Filter (KB
911895)', every time I boot up, Windows attempts, and fails to install what
seems to be a non-existent piece of HID interface hardware. So, how do I
turn this off so I don't have to deal with it every bootup?! Thanks! I read
the article, but could find no reference about how to do so.


From: Andrew E. on
With that low of a numbered update you must be in SP1,try updating
to SP2 & SP3,those updates start at about 950000.

"Ted Curtin" wrote:

> Since automatic update downloaded the 'HID Non-User Input Data Filter (KB
> 911895)', every time I boot up, Windows attempts, and fails to install what
> seems to be a non-existent piece of HID interface hardware. So, how do I
> turn this off so I don't have to deal with it every bootup?! Thanks! I read
> the article, but could find no reference about how to do so.
>
>
> .
>
From: Ted Curtin on
No, I have SP2, but I think this was downloaded in response to some software
that I installed... BTW, what's the latest take on SP3? I avoided it at
release when I heard about the many difficulties that people had with it,
and saw it suggested to avoid it - SP2 is working fine for me, should I
leave well enough alone?

"Andrew E." <eckrichco(a)msn.com> wrote in message
news:290AC29F-C360-48FD-BC9D-E4946B9F452D(a)microsoft.com...
> With that low of a numbered update you must be in SP1,try updating
> to SP2 & SP3,those updates start at about 950000.
>
> "Ted Curtin" wrote:
>
>> Since automatic update downloaded the 'HID Non-User Input Data Filter (KB
>> 911895)', every time I boot up, Windows attempts, and fails to install
>> what
>> seems to be a non-existent piece of HID interface hardware. So, how do I
>> turn this off so I don't have to deal with it every bootup?! Thanks! I
>> read
>> the article, but could find no reference about how to do so.
>>
>>
>> .
>>


From: Unknown on
Ted! Something to think about. You stated you heard about the many
difficulties people had with
SP3. I suggest you more or less ignore that info. Think of the MILLIONS of
people who have
installed it without a glitch. Reading these news groups you'll only hear of
the bad experiences
and not the good. And, I might add, those with the bad experiences in all
probability was caused
by non Microsoft items such as Symantec, Norton, and other programs.
"Ted Curtin" <tjcurtin1(a)verizon.net> wrote in message
news:OUx7uMkmKHA.1708(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> No, I have SP2, but I think this was downloaded in response to some
> software that I installed... BTW, what's the latest take on SP3? I avoided
> it at release when I heard about the many difficulties that people had
> with it, and saw it suggested to avoid it - SP2 is working fine for me,
> should I leave well enough alone?
>
> "Andrew E." <eckrichco(a)msn.com> wrote in message
> news:290AC29F-C360-48FD-BC9D-E4946B9F452D(a)microsoft.com...
>> With that low of a numbered update you must be in SP1,try updating
>> to SP2 & SP3,those updates start at about 950000.
>>
>> "Ted Curtin" wrote:
>>
>>> Since automatic update downloaded the 'HID Non-User Input Data Filter
>>> (KB
>>> 911895)', every time I boot up, Windows attempts, and fails to install
>>> what
>>> seems to be a non-existent piece of HID interface hardware. So, how do I
>>> turn this off so I don't have to deal with it every bootup?! Thanks! I
>>> read
>>> the article, but could find no reference about how to do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>
>


From: Peter Foldes on
Update to SP3

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"Ted Curtin" <tjcurtin1(a)verizon.net> wrote in message
news:e2HzyXYlKHA.3476(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Since automatic update downloaded the 'HID Non-User Input Data Filter (KB
> 911895)', every time I boot up, Windows attempts, and fails to install what seems
> to be a non-existent piece of HID interface hardware. So, how do I turn this off
> so I don't have to deal with it every bootup?! Thanks! I read the article, but
> could find no reference about how to do so.
>