How much TAX does a public servant pay?
in [Computers]
|
Prev: computer projector to match the screen?
Next: Paypal
From: me here on 18 Apr 2010 22:08 Herc7 wrote: > On Apr 19, 11:15�am, "me here" <gloaming_ag...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > Is this the same guy? > > > > http://www.rsvp.com.au/profile/display.jsp?handle=Herc7&uid=1342907 > > Why you want a date? > > I'm not saying eliminating a projected gross salary on a payslip is > wrong, I'm saying lets be honest, public servants consume tax they > don't contribute any tax. > > But this is as bad as convincing people when I open a book and it > answers the question I just asked with a random quote is > supernatural. Go on believing the system! YAY! Pay double tax for > all I care, but in reality public servants are glorified dole > bludgers. Same source of income as Centerlink payments. > > Herc Your reasoning is as good as your spelling. That's NOT the way your spell Superman's girlfriend"s name. Louis is a boys name.
From: Coach on 18 Apr 2010 23:13 On Apr 19, 12:08 pm, "me here" <gloaming_ag...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Herc7 wrote: > > On Apr 19, 11:15 am, "me here" <gloaming_ag...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Is this the same guy? > > > >http://www.rsvp.com.au/profile/display.jsp?handle=Herc7&uid=1342907 > > > Why you want a date? > > > I'm not saying eliminating a projected gross salary on a payslip is > > wrong, I'm saying lets be honest, public servants consume tax they > > don't contribute any tax. > > > But this is as bad as convincing people when I open a book and it > > answers the question I just asked with a random quote is > > supernatural. Go on believing the system! YAY! Pay double tax for > > all I care, but in reality public servants are glorified dole > > bludgers. Same source of income as Centerlink payments. > > > Herc > > Your reasoning is as good as your spelling. > > That's NOT the way your spell Superman's girlfriend"s name. Huh? What do you mean by "the way your spell"? Here's a tip I give ALL morons and ALL uneducated people like you. If you are going to have a go at someone for their spelling, you have to be damn sure that you don't make any spelling errors in your own post. And let's face it. It doesn't get much more basic than someone who can't spell "you". It must be mighty embarrassing being you right now.
From: me here on 18 Apr 2010 22:27 Coach wrote: > On Apr 19, 12:08�pm, "me here" <gloaming_ag...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > Herc7 wrote: > > > On Apr 19, 11:15�am, "me here" <gloaming_ag...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Is this the same guy? > > > > > > http://www.rsvp.com.au/profile/display.jsp?handle=Herc7&uid=1342 > > > > 907 > > > > > Why you want a date? > > > > > I'm not saying eliminating a projected gross salary on a payslip > > > is wrong, I'm saying lets be honest, public servants consume tax > > > they don't contribute any tax. > > > > > But this is as bad as convincing people when I open a book and it > > > answers the question I just asked with a random quote is > > > supernatural. �Go on believing the system! �YAY! �Pay double tax > > > for all I care, but in reality public servants are glorified dole > > > bludgers. �Same source of income as Centerlink payments. > > > > > Herc > > > > Your reasoning is as good as your spelling. > > > > That's NOT the way your spell Superman's girlfriend"s name. > > Huh? What do you mean by "the way your spell"? Here's a tip I give > ALL morons and ALL uneducated people like you. If you are going to > have a go at someone for their spelling, you have to be damn sure that > you don't make any spelling errors in your own post. And let's face > it. It doesn't get much more basic than someone who can't spell > "you". It must be mighty embarrassing being you right now. Gee I'm really hurt by that.
From: Herc7 on 19 Apr 2010 00:44 On Apr 19, 1:13 pm, Coach <suv...(a)yahoo.fr> wrote: > On Apr 19, 12:08 pm, "me here" <gloaming_ag...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Herc7 wrote: > > > On Apr 19, 11:15 am, "me here" <gloaming_ag...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Is this the same guy? > > > > >http://www.rsvp.com.au/profile/display.jsp?handle=Herc7&uid=1342907 > > > > Why you want a date? > > > > I'm not saying eliminating a projected gross salary on a payslip is > > > wrong, I'm saying lets be honest, public servants consume tax they > > > don't contribute any tax. > > > > But this is as bad as convincing people when I open a book and it > > > answers the question I just asked with a random quote is > > > supernatural. Go on believing the system! YAY! Pay double tax for > > > all I care, but in reality public servants are glorified dole > > > bludgers. Same source of income as Centerlink payments. > > > > Herc > > > Your reasoning is as good as your spelling. > > > That's NOT the way your spell Superman's girlfriend"s name. > > Huh? What do you mean by "the way your spell"? Here's a tip I give > ALL morons and ALL uneducated people like you. If you are going to > have a go at someone for their spelling, you have to be damn sure that > you don't make any spelling errors in your own post. And let's face > it. It doesn't get much more basic than someone who can't spell > "you". It must be mighty embarrassing being you right now. Why does someone in the private sector who earns $300 per week pay $60 tax but a stay at home public servant who gets paid by Centerlink pays NO tax? Same income - different tax. Why don't they also fudge the books for stay at home public servants we call Centerlink recipients. Maybe the whole idea of public servants actually do pay tax is complete BS! Why don't Centerlink payment recipients pay tax? They get an income. Money comes from the same revenue stream as all public servants get paid with. If you turn up from 9 to 5 Mon to Fri you get double the pay and PAY TAX If you stay at home and get half the pay from the same financial source you PAY NO TAX Think of all that negative gearing I would have made a mint on the dole! Herc
From: "i|||| | | || ||| || |||| 2.0" i| || ||| ||||| |||||| on 19 Apr 2010 01:00
"Herc7" <ozdude(a)australia.edu> wrote in message news:dc35e106-980c-4252-ac19-27619c30c8de(a)y14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... On Apr 19, 11:15 am, "me here" <gloaming_ag...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Is this the same guy? > > http://www.rsvp.com.au/profile/display.jsp?handle=Herc7&uid=1342907 Why you want a date? I'm not saying eliminating a projected gross salary on a payslip is wrong, I'm saying lets be honest, public servants consume tax they don't contribute any tax. But this is as bad as convincing people when I open a book and it answers the question I just asked with a random quote is supernatural. Go on believing the system! YAY! Pay double tax for all I care, but in reality public servants are glorified dole bludgers. Same source of income as Centerlink payments. -------- Which are taxable income, if you stay on it long enough it works out to zero, but it is still taxable. That yearly slip with payments and zero tax isn't for your convenience. CentreLink doesn't care and can't alter the salary if an employee shacks up with anyone. If a dole bludger shares with anybody, CentreLink does care a lot and can vary payments. Another difference, Centrelink can insist employees take the odd shower. Why do most long term unemployed try this line of argument? |