From: Ron Johnson on
On 05/14/2010 02:22 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
[snip]
>
> But in either case, for users who care about their Freedom, both Flash
> and Javascript are real threats, because even if you use a Free Software
> implementation of the language, the code run in each web-page will
> usually be 100% proprietary.
>

By your logic (since any language implementation can be used to
write proprietary software) gcc is dangerous.

--
Dissent is patriotic, remember?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4BEDA547.8060007(a)cox.net
From: Tzafrir Cohen on
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 02:32:23PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/14/2010 02:22 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> But in either case, for users who care about their Freedom, both Flash
>> and Javascript are real threats, because even if you use a Free Software
>> implementation of the language, the code run in each web-page will
>> usually be 100% proprietary.
>>
>
> By your logic (since any language implementation can be used to write
> proprietary software) gcc is dangerous.

Nope. Ghostscript might be dangerous, as it may run untrusted (postscript)
code.

--
Tzafrir Cohen | tzafrir(a)jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's
tzafrir(a)cohens.org.il | | best
tzafrir(a)debian.org | | friend


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100518010650.GC16560(a)pear.tzafrir.org.il