Prev: UNMATCH NEAR MATCH??
Next: Q2010 Backup Files
From: Notan on 21 Feb 2010 09:05 On 2/21/2010 6:20 AM, Mr.Jan wrote: > On Feb 20, 9:29 pm, Notan<notan(a)ddressthatcanbespammed> wrote: >> On 2/20/2010 7:25 PM, Mr.Jan wrote: <snip> >>> I understand completely. One can only do what one is comfortable >>> doing. I have found a couple of things to be changed based on our >>> discussions but internet security is a never changing process. Thanks >> >> "a never changing process" or "an ever changing process?" > > Ah. You have caught me with a typo. I am so embarrassed. That single > typo could have cause millions of our readers to lapse into > complacency thinking that internet security never changed and they > were, therefore, perpetually safe by doing nothing! I meant ever > changing, and that was a very good catch! Thank you. The same letters, two *very* different meanings!
From: Mr.Jan on 21 Feb 2010 09:51 On Feb 21, 9:05 am, Notan <notan(a)ddressthatcanbespammed> wrote: > On 2/21/2010 6:20 AM, Mr.Jan wrote: > > > On Feb 20, 9:29 pm, Notan<notan(a)ddressthatcanbespammed> wrote: > >> On 2/20/2010 7:25 PM, Mr.Jan wrote: > > <snip> > > >>> I understand completely. One can only do what one is comfortable > >>> doing. I have found a couple of things to be changed based on our > >>> discussions but internet security is a never changing process. Thanks > > >> "a never changing process" or "an ever changing process?" > > > Ah. You have caught me with a typo. I am so embarrassed. That single > > typo could have cause millions of our readers to lapse into > > complacency thinking that internet security never changed and they > > were, therefore, perpetually safe by doing nothing! I meant ever > > changing, and that was a very good catch! Thank you. > > The same letters, two *very* different meanings! I believe that was what I said. I am planning to nominate you for the editorial hall of fame!
From: desplin on 5 Mar 2010 17:01 On Feb 18, 8:15 am, "Eric J. Holtman" <e...(a)ericholtman.com> wrote: > Ted <usern...(a)isp.net.invalid> wrote in news:PM00047FD710B06125 > @Fred.hsd1.mn.comcast.net: > > > > >> Where do you think the information comes from when > >> you do a One Step Update? > > > Uh, I don't do One Step Updates. I enter my transactions manually and > > reconcile manually. It doesn't take long and I actually enjoy it. > > So, you think the bank doesn't keep a record > anywhere on any computer? > > How do you think they create your statement? > > Little gnomes in Zurich with green visors? I think the point is that with quicken it is not just your bank account that is available, it is your bank(s), credit cards, and investment accounts all with logon credentials available in one place. I can deal with one institution getting hacked, I don't want to deal with someone hacking quicken and getting access to ALL my accounts. I'll stay out of the cloud with my quicken data. Doug
From: Eric J. Holtman on 5 Mar 2010 20:25 desplin(a)yahoo.com wrote in news:c610fcaf-826c-4ed4-8e00-9e7ddf47a170 @k2g2000pro.googlegroups.com: > > I'll stay out of the cloud with my quicken data. > Which is almost certainly the right move. But you don't actually also believe that you're data isn't still out there on some server, right?
From: desplin on 5 Mar 2010 23:50
On Mar 5, 6:25 pm, "Eric J. Holtman" <e...(a)ericholtman.com> wrote: > desp...(a)yahoo.com wrote in news:c610fcaf-826c-4ed4-8e00-9e7ddf47a170 > @k2g2000pro.googlegroups.com: > > > > > I'll stay out of the cloud with my quicken data. > > Which is almost certainly the right move. But > you don't actually also believe that you're data > isn't still out there on some server, right? No, I'm sure every piece of it is out there somewhere. It is having it all in one place (with passwords) that concerns me the most. Doug |