I have almost given up on lisp
in [Lisp]
|
Prev: lisp vs smalltalk , haskell ruby and java, in philosophy
Next: Shape Symbology as a Basis for Lisp or Other AI Software Development
From: Raymond Wiker on 29 Dec 2009 14:20 Pillsy <pillsbury(a)gmail.com> writes: > On Dec 29, 1:46 am, gavino <gavcom...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > [...] >> but they aren't since I am quite intelligent...154 iq > > Hint: in Lisp, when you wish to write a number in octal, you do so by > prefixing it with the characters "#o". > > Hope that helps, #o154 is 108 decimal, which is still too high... #6r154 is decimal 70 - I wonder how Gavino ended up with an estimate of his IQ in base 6?
From: gavino on 30 Dec 2009 21:52 On Dec 29, 3:38 am, Frank Buss <f...(a)frank-buss.de> wrote: > gavino wrote: > > nope, and please show some programs you have written. > > thx > > You can see some of his programs, papers and video presentations on his > homepage: > > http://lispm.dyndns.org/ > > Now it's your turn. > > -- > Frank Buss, f...(a)frank-buss.dehttp://www.frank-buss.de,http://www.it4-systems.de nice stuff but I think I know why me and they guy are at odds: hes a mac guy!
From: gavino on 30 Dec 2009 21:53 On Dec 29, 6:31 am, Leandro Rios <leandroprograma...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > gavino <gavcom...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > On Dec 27, 5:33 am, Tamas K Papp <tkp...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> You guys are keeping him alive. Good job. > > >> Tamas > > > but they aren't since I am quite intelligent...154 iq > > And yet you weren't able to learn Lisp in... let's see... three or four years? > I learned Lisp in less than that time, so I must be over 154. Yay! > > Leandro I suppose I could try harder. What apps did you do?
From: gavino on 30 Dec 2009 21:54 On Dec 29, 9:59 am, Pillsy <pillsb...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 29, 1:46 am, gavino <gavcom...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > [...] > > > but they aren't since I am quite intelligent...154 iq > > Hint: in Lisp, when you wish to write a number in octal, you do so by > prefixing it with the characters "#o". > > Hope that helps, > Pillsy wow that was a nerdy but cool reply bravo
From: gavino on 30 Dec 2009 21:54
On Dec 29, 11:55 am, "Dr. Brian Leverich" <lever...(a)linkpendium.com> wrote: > On 2009-12-29, gavino <gavcom...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > but under reagan many were and the reagan miracle resulted: 8 year > > pace and bigggest economic real growth in 120 years...much more growth > > than clinton, and after obama we wil need another reagan...bigtime > > Idiot. > > Sustained deficit spending will do that. Reagan had the > good fortune to bail before bad fiscal discipline caught > up with him, while GWB didn't. > > Love, B. dem congress did deficit , dunce by spending, get this, more than taxes taken in, dunce www.mises.org read up |