From: Steve Firth on 23 Jan 2010 16:30 Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > When Rowland rants about his imaginary self-diagnosed illnesses.. > > > > > > What makes you think they're imaginary? > > > > His entire performance and the fact that he has claimed in the past that > > he self-diagnoses his mental problems. > > He strikes you as being completely sane, normal and level headed, eh? He strikes me as someone who is a poser pretending to have mental problems in order to excuse behaving like a fuckwit.
From: J. J. Lodder on 23 Jan 2010 17:02 Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > J. J. Lodder <nospam(a)de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: > > <snip> > > Not. Helping. Yes. It was. James Jolley should be made to see that he has sinned against the most basic rules of usenet by threatening legal proceedings against a poster. That is just NOT DONE, and there can be no excuse for doing it. He should admit his mistake, and apologise for it, Jan
From: J.J. O'Shea on 23 Jan 2010 17:26 On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:02:07 -0500, J. J. Lodder wrote (in article <1jcsmwz.v1sat91ekejflN(a)de-ster.xs4all.nl>): > Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > >> J. J. Lodder <nospam(a)de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >> Not. Helping. > > Yes. It was. > James Jolley should be made to see that he has sinned > against the most basic rules of usenet > by threatening legal proceedings against a poster. And once again the intellectually honest one has decided that he's the king of USENET. > > That is just NOT DONE, > and there can be no excuse for doing it. > > He should admit his mistake, > and apologise for it, Oh, the irony. > > Jan -- email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
From: Jim on 23 Jan 2010 17:32 Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote: > > He strikes you as being completely sane, normal and level headed, eh? > > He strikes me as someone who is a poser pretending to have mental > problems in order to excuse behaving like a fuckwit. Wow. Just...wow. Jim -- "Microsoft admitted its Vista operating system was a 'less good product' in what IT experts have described as the most ambitious understatement since the captain of the Titanic reported some slightly damp tablecloths." http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
From: Pd on 24 Jan 2010 07:01
J.J. O'Shea <try.not.to(a)but.see.sig> wrote: > Of course, as he has absolutely no way to enforce his 'rules'... Do you think he knows that, or not? I'm sure I've seen Mr Lodder posting here before Sept'09. -- Pd |