I'm pissed off with James Jolley's libels and viciousness
in [UK Mac]
|
From: Pd on 24 Jan 2010 07:04 James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: > I wonder how realistic a viewpoint this is. Let's say, just for a > thought experiment, I decide to do myself in because of this. Who would > be responsible? Obviously, i'd have done myself in, but in terms, there > are issues of morality. Interesting you should have chosen this particular thought experiment, given who you're fighting the righteous battle against. > No, if he was in front of me, he'd be punched, end of story. That's > what life is, online or off. He's crossed the line on so many levels > with me and others, i'm amazed nobody has actually figured out where he > lives. Look at the trouble he causes on UPSD. Point taken. Lets get our pitchforks and torches, find out where this psycho lives and get him!! -- Pd
From: James Jolley on 24 Jan 2010 07:18 On 2010-01-24 12:04:50 +0000, peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid (Pd) said: > James Jolley <jrjolley(a)me.com> wrote: > >> I wonder how realistic a viewpoint this is. Let's say, just for a >> thought experiment, I decide to do myself in because of this. Who would >> be responsible? Obviously, i'd have done myself in, but in terms, there >> are issues of morality. > > Interesting you should have chosen this particular thought experiment, > given who you're fighting the righteous battle against. Not really, the guy's been bullying the disabled all week. It's an interesting point of discussion but because I decide to bring it up, it begins again - let's worship Rowland. > >> No, if he was in front of me, he'd be punched, end of story. That's >> what life is, online or off. He's crossed the line on so many levels >> with me and others, i'm amazed nobody has actually figured out where he >> lives. Look at the trouble he causes on UPSD. > > Point taken. Lets get our pitchforks and torches, find out where this > psycho lives and get him!! Again, discussion wasted. The way I see it, we all have responsibility for our actions - except rowly of course.
From: Pd on 24 Jan 2010 07:46 Pd <peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid> wrote: > Lets get our pitchforks and torches, find out where this > psycho lives and get him!! Oh my chagrin! Of course, I meant to say let's get our pitchforks etc. -- Pd
From: Steve Firth on 24 Jan 2010 07:56 Pd <peterd.news(a)gmail.invalid> wrote: > Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote: > > > And the answer to your question is "yes", but I won't be fawning over > > Rowland McBollox as appears to be de rigeur here. > > Nobody wants you to fawn over him. Just don't provoke And on and on for pages of self-congratulatory bollocks. > killfile if your self-control is that bad. It's not a matter of my self control being "that bad'. Your view appears to be that you know far better than I or anyone else what to do in this situation. You're wrong, it's been handled your way here and elsewhere and it makes not a jot of difference. McDonnell continues to bully and abuse all newcomers. > You're not helping. You repeat this as a mantra, you're wrong. I'm not playing your game your way. You do as you see fit, don't lecture me in your pompous arrogant manner. No one died and nominated you as the conscience and prime motivator of the group.
From: Pd on 24 Jan 2010 08:42
Steve Firth <%steve%@malloc.co.uk> wrote: > I'm not playing your game your way. Keep playing your way then, seems to be working so far. Umm... > You do as you see fit, don't lecture > me in your pompous arrogant manner. Will if I want to. You haven't even seen my pompous arrogant manner yet, I'm saving that until I've seen how it works out for you. -- Pd |