I'm so proud, I weaned someone off a P&S to a DSLR!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Immigration: The shocking truth about the immigrants who openedthe floodgates
Next: The real cost of being sued by Getty
From: nospam on 22 Oct 2009 13:21 In article <oh31e5tohfgpvqkvb6ci4t993en1di23d0(a)4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > The G10 was clearly a mistake by Canon, hardly. it sold quite well and is a very capable camera. > and I think it's telling that > you choose to pick on it instead of the new G11. doesn't matter, the g11 may be better in some ways but it isn't really all that much different. > I spent some time shooting yesterday with the new S90, which uses the > same high sensitivity sensor as the G11, has an even more amazing f/2.0 > lens, and the results in low light were stunningly good. compared to what? under what conditions? what iso? what exactly is 'stunningly good'? let's see some examples. you left out a lot of details. is that coincidence, or an attempt to mislead?
From: John Navas on 22 Oct 2009 13:29 On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:21:47 -0700, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in <221020091021477866%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>: >In article <2131e59fuj1vutb4kua0p0htm3iacg5mro(a)4ax.com>, John Navas ><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> Whether ISO 3200 matters or not is only a matter of personal preference, > >obviously. just as it is with any feature. > >> and to me, and I think to a large majority of other people, it doesn't >> matter, making it irrelevant. > >you think wrong. In your opinion. Mine differs. ;) And there we have it. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: John Navas on 22 Oct 2009 13:32 On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:21:51 -0700, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in <221020091021518081%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>: >In article <oh31e5tohfgpvqkvb6ci4t993en1di23d0(a)4ax.com>, John Navas ><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> The G10 was clearly a mistake by Canon, > >hardly. it sold quite well and is a very capable camera. > >> and I think it's telling that >> you choose to pick on it instead of the new G11. > >doesn't matter, the g11 may be better in some ways but it isn't really >all that much different. You obviously don't know it. >> I spent some time shooting yesterday with the new S90, which uses the >> same high sensitivity sensor as the G11, has an even more amazing f/2.0 >> lens, and the results in low light were stunningly good. > >compared to what? The original scenes and other cameras. >under what conditions? Low light. (Is your reading comprehension really that bad?) >what iso? Auto. >what exactly is >'stunningly good'? My assessment. >let's see some examples. you left out a lot of >details. is that coincidence, or an attempt to mislead? You'll have to first demonstrate common courtesy and an open mind. Otherwise it would be a pointless waste of my time. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: John Navas on 22 Oct 2009 13:33 On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:21:49 -0700, nospam <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in <221020091021497966%nospam(a)nospam.invalid>: >In article <3e31e5pt4q50r7j3oo2i7egisd9sjr4dsh(a)4ax.com>, John Navas ><spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> >>The best compact digital cameras now have very good ISO 400 performance. >> > >> >Even assuming you are correct - how are they at 1600 or 3200? >> >> How is your dSLR at ISO 204800? > >how is your straw man? Pretty much the same as yours. ;) >> Both questions are meaningless. > >it is not a meaningless. compacts suck at 1600-3200, dslrs do not. very >simple. dSLRs such at ISO 204800. Equally meaningless. You're clutching at straws. -- Best regards, John Buying a dSLR doesn't make you a photographer, it makes you a dSLR owner. "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." -Ansel Adams
From: nospam on 22 Oct 2009 13:52
In article <bk51e5p2erp3sg27b12i42ijso04uf4d9e(a)4ax.com>, John Navas <spamfilter1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> I spent some time shooting yesterday with the new S90, which uses the > >> same high sensitivity sensor as the G11, has an even more amazing f/2.0 > >> lens, and the results in low light were stunningly good. > > > >compared to what? > > The original scenes and other cameras. which other cameras would that be? compared to a cellphone camera the g11 would be stunningly good. compared to a nikon d700, not so much. > >under what conditions? > > Low light. (Is your reading comprehension really that bad?) how low? you love vague terms. > >what iso? > > Auto. 'auto' is not a number. > >what exactly is > >'stunningly good'? > > My assessment. that's a laugh. > >let's see some examples. you left out a lot of > >details. is that coincidence, or an attempt to mislead? > > You'll have to first demonstrate common courtesy and an open mind. > Otherwise it would be a pointless waste of my time. yet you seem to have so much time to waste. funny that. |