I received a warning from Google ......
in [Anti-Virus]
|
From: Virus Guy on 7 Aug 2010 09:43 ~BD~ wrote: > I was using Safari and got a warning when I visited a URL. If you're not going to give us the exact url that spawned the warning, then why bother posting? It's a waste of time if we don't have the exact URL so we can grab a sample of the malware.
From: Ant on 7 Aug 2010 10:01 "~BD~" wrote: > I was using Safari and got a warning when I visited a URL - - - $> wget -s h**p://uncoached.com/ HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:58:03 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.16 (CentOS) Last-Modified: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:29:02 GMT ETag: "f70c8-63-48d1535b92b80" Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 99 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 The site is currently down for maitenance. It will be back up shortly. Thank you for your patience - - - Nothing to warn about there. Perhaps they were compromised and are cleaning up.
From: FromTheRafters on 7 Aug 2010 16:08 "ASCII" <me2(a)privacy.net> wrote in message news:4c5db889.785015(a)EDCBIC... > FromTheRafters wrote: >> >>"Just visiting a site that hosts malware can infect your computer". I >>suspect that ASCII will find that it *cannot* infect *his* computer - >>thus making that statement blatantly false. > > I did indeed visit (or try to) that site and got this: > "The site is currently down for maitenance. It will be back up > shortly. Thank > you for your patience" They probably have to remove iframes from all of their webpages.
From: Peter Foldes on 7 Aug 2010 20:07 BD Mark will never let you post there on his site so do not even keep on trying. You know the story Burn me once ,Shame on me. Burn me twice ,you are gone. And you keep showing the same continuously to this day with the exception of scorched - earth. It will not be long there either.. Banned by Ahuma,Annex,Doganet, 6 other servers. And you do not know why? LOL. You are a Troll and a complete idiot -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. http://www.microsoft.com/protect "~BD~" <BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:WeidnQxlHuhbCsDRnZ2dnUVZ8tGdnZ2d(a)bt.com... > FromTheRafters wrote: >> "~BD~"<BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
From: FromTheRafters on 7 Aug 2010 20:35
"~BD~" <BoaterDave~no.spam~@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:WeidnQxlHuhbCsDRnZ2dnUVZ8tGdnZ2d(a)bt.com... [...] > You know far more about computing than I ever will. If you experiment > with Google Chrome you will note that if you change *133* to 132 or > 134 there is *no* similar warning. It relates simply to the thread > started by Roy C. > > Perhaps this matter is of little significance but I'd be interested in > your view. Perhaps not the post, but something *in* the post warrants an alert. Some anti-badstuff programs not only scan for malware, but follow found links to *other* locations and search them too. A posted URL to a photo hosting site that is "infected" with an iframe to a known malware server site might get investigated by antimalware/safe surf type programs. Do you recall the "price of rice in china" post I made a while back? It turned out that I posted a URL that was currently (or at one time) leading to malware, a safe surfing browser feature finding that post on a web based NNTP gateway could make one believe the gateway itself was infected because the safe browsing feature followed links posted there to exploits with no teeth. |