IDIOTIC Google Images Question. . .
in [Computer]
|
Prev: Problems with DDR memory
Next: PCI express power adapter
From: Jeff Strickland on 19 Jul 2010 10:46 I went to Google Images and input YANKEE STADIUM, and got 730,000 results in 0.03 seconds. I scroll to the bottom of the page and click NEXT to see the next batch of results. WinXPPro, SP3 and IE8. "ChrisCoaster" <ckozicki(a)snet.net> wrote in message news:e61741b7-4684-4530-a0b0-a1a5e092df78(a)y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > But had to ask: > > If you have been in the images section of Google lately, you'll see > that's been revamped - for the worst, IMO. > > Say you type "Yankee Stadium". Right about now you should get about > 1,100,000 results. All well and good. 25 pictures related to the > Stadium appear, of various sizes. Now my question is: HOW the HECK > do you go about seeing the remaining 1,099,974 of them?! > > There's NO FRICKIN "Next" arrow or button at the bottom! DUH!! > > -CC
From: ChrisCoaster on 19 Jul 2010 16:45 On Jul 19, 10:46 am, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrj...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > I went to Google Images and input YANKEE STADIUM, and got 730,000 results in > 0.03 seconds. I scroll to the bottom of the page and click NEXT to see the > next batch of results. > > WinXPPro, SP3 and IE8. > > - Show quoted text - ______________________ Jeff, please read my two posts immediately prior to yours(both dated 7/18, one 5:40 and the other 5:43PM EDT), and click on the links within, to gain some insight on the exact issue here before stating the obvious. -CC
From: Jeff Strickland on 19 Jul 2010 17:59 "ChrisCoaster" <ckozicki(a)snet.net> wrote in message news:4f4367f0-64f8-4ddb-a691-28d37dbfd55b(a)t10g2000yqg.googlegroups.com... On Jul 19, 10:46 am, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrj...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > I went to Google Images and input YANKEE STADIUM, and got 730,000 results > in > 0.03 seconds. I scroll to the bottom of the page and click NEXT to see the > next batch of results. > > WinXPPro, SP3 and IE8. > > - Show quoted text - ______________________ Jeff, please read my two posts immediately prior to yours(both dated 7/18, one 5:40 and the other 5:43PM EDT), and click on the links within, to gain some insight on the exact issue here before stating the obvious. -CC I clicked each link and get the same result as if I enter YANKEE STADIUM myself. There are 727k results in 0.04 seconds, and a link at the bottom that says, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, (and so on), and NEXT. I have no problem with the Google Image Search page or the results presentation. Sorry, you must have a setting done wrong somewhere.
From: ChrisCoaster on 19 Jul 2010 18:05
On Jul 19, 5:59 pm, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrj...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > "ChrisCoaster" <ckozi...(a)snet.net> wrote in message > > news:4f4367f0-64f8-4ddb-a691-28d37dbfd55b(a)t10g2000yqg.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 19, 10:46 am, "Jeff Strickland" <crwlrj...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > I went to Google Images and input YANKEE STADIUM, and got 730,000 results > > in > > 0.03 seconds. I scroll to the bottom of the page and click NEXT to see the > > next batch of results. > > > WinXPPro, SP3 and IE8. > > > - Show quoted text - > > ______________________ > Jeff, please read my two posts immediately prior to yours(both dated > 7/18, one 5:40 and the other 5:43PM EDT), and click on the links > within, to gain some insight on the exact issue here before stating > the obvious. > > -CC > > I clicked each link and get the same result as if I enter YANKEE STADIUM > myself. There are 727k results in 0.04 seconds, and a link at the bottom > that says, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, (and so on), and NEXT. > > I have no problem with the Google Image Search page or the results > presentation. Sorry, you must have a setting done wrong somewhere. _________________________________ Please! click here: http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/022559.html You haven't seen a Google Images search page like the one on top in that link?? It's fine if you haven't but DON'T BLAME someone else's browser or "settings" off the bat. If you aren't having problems with google images search (old or new version) fine! But that new-fangled thing was up much of last week and has since been taken down. But it was up and was giving other searches like me hell on earth. -CC |