From: Volker Lendecke on 22 Dec 2009 09:20 On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:13:46AM -0800, RuiDC wrote: > This is the normal way to build a port. I guess if you think that there is a > problem in this wrapping then my only recourse is to seek the port > maintainer. You might try to compile it manually first. It's not much harder than installing a port: ../configure; make Volker
From: RuiDC on 22 Dec 2009 09:20 Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:31:20AM -0800, RuiDC wrote: >> >> >> >> Volker Lendecke wrote: >> > >> > Please compile with -g (./configure.developer will do that). >> > >> >> I did, as I selected the WITH_MAX_DEBUG and it built dmalloc, here is the >> extract from the ports Makefile: >> >> .if defined(WITH_MAX_DEBUG) >> CPPFLAGS+= -g >> LDFLAGS+= -g >> LIB_DEPENDS+= dmalloc.1:${PORTSDIR}/devel/dmalloc >> CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --enable-debug \ >> --enable-socket-wrapper --enable-nss-wrapper \ >> --enable-developer --enable-krb5developer \ >> --enable-dmalloc --with-profiling-data > > Ok, I guess then something is broken with your build > environment. Can you try building with just with > > ./configure; make > > and retry? BTW, WITH_MAX_DEBUG does not show up in the samba > sources. What is this?? > > That's like a wrapper or meta-option in FreeBSD ports Makefile: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net/samba33/Makefile?rev=1.9;content-type=text%2Fplain This is the normal way to build a port. I guess if you think that there is a problem in this wrapping then my only recourse is to seek the port maintainer. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Illegal-instruction%3A-4-%28core-dumped%29-when-running-testparm----sn-mbd-with-default-config-tp26879957p26888986.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: RuiDC on 22 Dec 2009 09:40 Volker Lendecke wrote: > > You might try to compile it manually first. It's not much > harder than installing a port: > ./configure; make > I'm recompiling with port and debug now and capturing the output. I did see the -g is passed to make though. I'll post the output and then see if it's possible to do it the non-ports way - as there is no ./configure file and there will be FreeBSD patches that need to be applied etc... but this will take a few hours each run. Thanks, RuiDC -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Illegal-instruction%3A-4-%28core-dumped%29-when-running-testparm----sn-mbd-with-default-config-tp26879957p26889182.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Volker Lendecke on 22 Dec 2009 09:50 On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:32:37AM -0800, RuiDC wrote: > > > Volker Lendecke wrote: > > > > You might try to compile it manually first. It's not much > > harder than installing a port: > > ./configure; make > > > I'm recompiling with port and debug now and capturing the output. I did see > the -g is passed to make though. I'll post the output and then see if it's > possible to do it the non-ports way - as there is no ./configure file and > there will be FreeBSD patches that need to be applied etc... but this will > take a few hours each run. What??? No ./configure? Where did you download the sources from? This does not sound like Samba, probably we are talking about different software packages. I am talking about the free SMB server that you can download from http://www.samba.org, what are you talking about??? Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: RuiDC on 22 Dec 2009 10:10 Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:32:37AM -0800, RuiDC wrote: >> possible to do it the non-ports way - as there is no ./configure file and > > What??? No ./configure? Where did you download the sources > from? This does not sound like Samba, probably we are > talking about different software packages. I am talking > about the free SMB server that you can download from > http://www.samba.org, what are you talking about??? > We are talking about the same thing. Sorry, my mistake in communicating... AFAIK, the way FreeBSD ports work is that they provide packaging wrappers around the sources, so your .configure will still be there - somewhere - but users are not meant to go near it. RuiDC -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Illegal-instruction%3A-4-%28core-dumped%29-when-running-testparm----sn-mbd-with-default-config-tp26879957p26889648.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: samba password complexity help? Next: [Samba] net rpc user add produces duplicate SID |