Illegal instruction: 4 (core dumped) when running testparm & [sn]mbd with default config
in [Samba]
|
From: RuiDC on 22 Dec 2009 16:30 have the Samba developers got any ARM hardware to develop against? As i'm now led to believe this may be a general problem with samba on FreeBSD on ARM: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2009-December/002104.html Volker Lendecke wrote: > > I would try to just compile "hello, world" > with more and more Samba compile options and libraries until > it breaks. But this is an iterative process that is very > difficult to guide you through via mail. > Unfortunately, i'm not a C++ developer so unless the Samba developers can assist, those of us with FreeBSD on ARM are stuck. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Illegal-instruction%3A-4-%28core-dumped%29-when-running-testparm----sn-mbd-with-default-config-tp26879957p26894584.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Volker Lendecke on 22 Dec 2009 15:00 On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:49:52AM -0800, RuiDC wrote: > ok, i have uninstalled the port version, verified it was gone, downloaded > 3.3.9 source from samba.org, recompiled using ./configure.developer (output > attached http://old.nabble.com/file/p26893324/samba_vanilla.tar.gz > samba_vanilla.tar.gz ), run a make (output also in attachment), and make > install, and run: > set LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/samba/lib > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > and get what looks like the same output: > [root(a)splug /usr/local/samba/bin]# ./testparm > Illegal instruction: 4 (core dumped) > [root(a)splug /usr/local/samba/bin]# gdb ./testparm > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain > conditions. > Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. > This GDB was configured as "arm-marcel-freebsd"... > (gdb) run > Starting program: /usr/local/samba/bin/testparm > > Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. > 0x00012104 in ?? () > (gdb) bt full > #0 0x00012104 in ?? () > No symbol table info available. > Error accessing memory address 0x0: Bad address. > (gdb) list > 264 fprintf(stderr,"Warning: Service %s defines a print > command, but \ > 265 rameter is ignored when using CUPS libraries.\n", > 266 lp_servicename(s) ); > 267 } > 268 #endif > 269 } > 270 > 271 int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) > 272 { > 273 const char *config_file = get_dyn_CONFIGFILE(); Very weird. Next step I would try is to compile the typical "hello, world" program and see what that does. Beyond that -- I doubt that without access to such a box (which I do not have) I can be of much help. Sorry, Volker
From: RuiDC on 22 Dec 2009 15:00 ok, i have uninstalled the port version, verified it was gone, downloaded 3.3.9 source from samba.org, recompiled using ./configure.developer (output attached http://old.nabble.com/file/p26893324/samba_vanilla.tar.gz samba_vanilla.tar.gz ), run a make (output also in attachment), and make install, and run: set LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/samba/lib export LD_LIBRARY_PATH and get what looks like the same output: [root(a)splug /usr/local/samba/bin]# ./testparm Illegal instruction: 4 (core dumped) [root(a)splug /usr/local/samba/bin]# gdb ./testparm GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "arm-marcel-freebsd"... (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/local/samba/bin/testparm Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0x00012104 in ?? () (gdb) bt full #0 0x00012104 in ?? () No symbol table info available. Error accessing memory address 0x0: Bad address. (gdb) list 264 fprintf(stderr,"Warning: Service %s defines a print command, but \ 265 rameter is ignored when using CUPS libraries.\n", 266 lp_servicename(s) ); 267 } 268 #endif 269 } 270 271 int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) 272 { 273 const char *config_file = get_dyn_CONFIGFILE(); -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Illegal-instruction%3A-4-%28core-dumped%29-when-running-testparm----sn-mbd-with-default-config-tp26879957p26893324.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: RuiDC on 22 Dec 2009 15:20 Volker Lendecke wrote: > > Very weird. Next step I would try is to compile the typical > "hello, world" program and see what that does. Beyond that > -- I doubt that without access to such a box (which I do not > have) I can be of much help. > Other compiles, including nano and bash have worked fine. Is there anything else i can do? Has samba ever worked on FreeBSD on ARM? Is this configuration supported by Samba? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Illegal-instruction%3A-4-%28core-dumped%29-when-running-testparm----sn-mbd-with-default-config-tp26879957p26893636.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Volker Lendecke on 22 Dec 2009 15:20 On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:12:36PM -0800, RuiDC wrote: > > Very weird. Next step I would try is to compile the typical > > "hello, world" program and see what that does. Beyond that > > -- I doubt that without access to such a box (which I do not > > have) I can be of much help. > > > Other compiles, including nano and bash have worked fine. > Is there anything else i can do? > Has samba ever worked on FreeBSD on ARM? > Is this configuration supported by Samba? Well, in theory it should work, and I'd love to make it run. The next steps I would try is to step by step strip down the compile options from the Makefile, maybe also try to eliminate the shared libraries we link in until we end up with something simple enough that it starts to work. Alternatively, I would try to just compile "hello, world" with more and more Samba compile options and libraries until it breaks. But this is an iterative process that is very difficult to guide you through via mail. Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: samba password complexity help? Next: [Samba] net rpc user add produces duplicate SID |