From: ImageAnalyst on 3 Jan 2010 20:45 Dave: This one worked. Looking at the 3D gamut, it does appear that this one is less correlated because the gamut is more spherical rather than cigar shaped.
From: Akshay Chaudhari on 8 Jan 2010 03:39
ImageAnalyst <imageanalyst(a)mailinator.com> wrote in message <ef3a0fac-fb45-4da1-8558-f5831f78b9b1(a)34g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>... > Dave: > This one worked. Looking at the 3D gamut, it does appear that this > one is less correlated because the gamut is more spherical rather than > cigar shaped. Hey Image/Dave, First of all, thank you very much for all the feedback, its very useful to get a perspective like that in a field you have just entered. Sadly however, there is a slight problem. The stains that we used for the cell didn't work out like the image I showed you. http://www.flickr.com/photos/38763226(a)N02/4256358002/ Its more like that, where the area of interest is usually almost enclosed by the dark brown perimeter. Is there a way that we could still quantify the area and/or perimeter of those enclosed regions? Pre-emptive thanks! |