From: ImageAnalyst on
Dave:
This one worked. Looking at the 3D gamut, it does appear that this
one is less correlated because the gamut is more spherical rather than
cigar shaped.
From: Akshay Chaudhari on
ImageAnalyst <imageanalyst(a)mailinator.com> wrote in message <ef3a0fac-fb45-4da1-8558-f5831f78b9b1(a)34g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>...
> Dave:
> This one worked. Looking at the 3D gamut, it does appear that this
> one is less correlated because the gamut is more spherical rather than
> cigar shaped.

Hey Image/Dave,
First of all, thank you very much for all the feedback, its very useful to get a perspective like that in a field you have just entered. Sadly however, there is a slight problem. The stains that we used for the cell didn't work out like the image I showed you.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/38763226(a)N02/4256358002/

Its more like that, where the area of interest is usually almost enclosed by the dark brown perimeter. Is there a way that we could still quantify the area and/or perimeter of those enclosed regions?

Pre-emptive thanks!