Impossible Variable Star Curves Predicted by BaTh.
in [Relativity]
|
From: Jerry on 14 Jul 2010 20:17 On Jul 14, 1:26 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 21:13:35 -0700 (PDT), Jerry > > > > > > <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >On Jul 13, 9:03 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Jerry > > >> <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >> >On Jul 12, 5:31 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > > >> >> >What magical principles of physics prevent stellar systems from > >> >> >adopting most possible combinations of yaw and eccentricity with > >> >> >respect to little ol' earth? > > >> >> All possible configurations are there for anyone who cares to look......but high > >> >> eccentricities are not particularly common. The variables of most interest are > >> >> cepheids and eclipsing binaries. > > >> >Most of your predicted luminosity curves DO NOT EXIST. > > >> >You can try to prove me wrong by providing ONE example of > >> >a periodic burster (the converse of an eclipsing binary). > > >> They are called 'flare stars'. Quite common. > > >Oh, you are utterly PATHETIC. > > >Flare stars are aperiodic or quasi-periodic. > > >There are NONE, ZERO, ZIP with regular, equal magnitude > >flares equivalent to the regular luminosity dips of eclipsing > >binaries. > > Then I suggest you go out and look for some. Not my burden, Ralph, you pathetic little megalomaniac. YOU are the one making the absurd claims. Jerry
From: eric gisse on 14 Jul 2010 23:18 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:09:40 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nospam(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >>..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Jerry >>> <Cephalobus_alienus(a)comcast.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Jul 12, 5:31 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >>>> >>>>> >What magical principles of physics prevent stellar systems from >>>>> >adopting most possible combinations of yaw and eccentricity with >>>>> >respect to little ol' earth? >>>>> >>>>> All possible configurations are there for anyone who cares to >>>>> look.....but high eccentricities are not particularly common. The >>>>> variables of most interest are cepheids and eclipsing binaries. >>>> >>>>Most of your predicted luminosity curves DO NOT EXIST. >>>> >>>>You can try to prove me wrong by providing ONE example of >>>>a periodic burster (the converse of an eclipsing binary). >>> >>> They are called 'flare stars'. Quite common. >> >>Name one that you believe is satisfactory. >> >>Name it, don't just wave your hand. > > the reason that there are far more eclipse type brightness curves than > regular flares should be obvious. There are many genuinely eclipsing > binaries! Since there are so many, you can name one. > >>[...] > > > Henry Wilson... > > .......Einstein's Relativity...The religion that worships negative space.
From: eric gisse on 14 Jul 2010 23:19 ...@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: [...] >>There are NONE, ZERO, ZIP with regular, equal magnitude >>flares equivalent to the regular luminosity dips of eclipsing >>binaries. > > Then I suggest you go out and look for some. Imagine that. You can't support your claims so you ask someone else to do your research for you. [...]
From: Jerry on 15 Jul 2010 04:14 On Jul 14, 1:28 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:09:40 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: > >> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Jerry > >> <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >>>You can try to prove me wrong by providing ONE example of > >>>a periodic burster (the converse of an eclipsing binary). > > >> They are called 'flare stars'. Quite common. > > >Name one that you believe is satisfactory. > > >Name it, don't just wave your hand. > > the reason that there are far more eclipse type brightness curves than regular > flares should be obvious. There are many genuinely eclipsing binaries! Yeah... like approximately 100% of them... Jerry
From: eric gisse on 15 Jul 2010 04:42
Jerry wrote: > On Jul 14, 1:28 pm, ..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:09:40 -0700, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >..@..(Henry Wilson DSc) wrote: >> >> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Jerry >> >> <Cephalobus_alie...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >> >>>You can try to prove me wrong by providing ONE example of >> >>>a periodic burster (the converse of an eclipsing binary). >> >> >> They are called 'flare stars'. Quite common. >> >> >Name one that you believe is satisfactory. >> >> >Name it, don't just wave your hand. >> >> the reason that there are far more eclipse type brightness curves than >> regular flares should be obvious. There are many genuinely eclipsing >> binaries! > > Yeah... like approximately 100% of them... > > Jerry I like how Henry can't even name one star he believes supports his opinion. I wonder why Henry even talks to me. I've been harassing him for years about his forged degrees and he just refuses to acknowledge it. It is obviously a sore spot for him. |