From: Archimedes Plutonium on
So, you have one class in college physics where the professor is
saying that
Special Relativity SR, comes down to where the speed of light is a
constant
in all inertial reference frames, meaning that c + v = c and where c -
v = c
where c is the speed of light and v is a speed added or subtracted on.
And
SR is equivalent to the Maxwell theory that a moving magnet in a
stationary
wire loop is the very same as a moving wire loop with stationary
magnets.
So this is common accepted physics.

But later on in that college physics course when talking about Doppler
shift effect,
it is remarked by the professor that if the light source is moving
away or moving
towards the observer, that we see a redshift or blueshift respectively
and where
c + v is not c and where c - v is not c, but rather we have c + v = c
+v and where
we have c - v = c-v.

So the house of physics, modern day physics is not in good consistent
order, but
rather riddled full of holes of inconsistency.

There is absolutely no observational data to support a Doppler shift
Effect in physics
but there are plenty of observations to support a nonexistent Doppler
shift effect on
EM waves. There is the Michelson Morley Experiment and there is
Special Relativity,
but also, there is the observation that a radio receiver never has to
compensate for a
Doppler effect, no matter how fast the vehicle carrying the radio is
going towards or
away from the transmitter.

So the house of physics of 2010 is riddled full of holes of
inconsistency.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
From: Archimedes Plutonium on

>
> There is absolutely no observational data to support a Doppler shift
> Effect in physics for EM waves (Sound waves are a different story) (sic)
> But there are plenty of observations to support a nonexistent Doppler
> shift effect on

changed it in the original followed with a (sic)