Prev: SR is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT - Tom Roberts
Next: Minkowski Metric.
From: GogoJF on 27 May 2010 10:52
On May 27, 9:12 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 25, 6:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 25, 9:45 am, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 25, 9:42 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On 5/25/10 9:19 AM, GogoJF wrote:
>
> > > > > When it comes to light, what is the difference?  Isn't it two
> > > > > different buzz words to describe a single phenomenon?
>
> > > >    When you look at the moon you see it as it was about 1.3 second
> > > >    ago. Sun - About 8 minutes. Vega, when you look at Vega, you are
> > > >    seeing it as it was more than 25 years ago.
>
> > > Aw man, your living in the past.  This question restated:  what is the
> > > difference between instant and infinite when it comes to light, when
> > > dealing with physics?
>
> > Light has infinite range, which means that there is not a range from
> > the source that the light will never cross.
>
> > However, the time it takes to get to any given range is nonzero.
> > Therefore it is not instantaneous transmission.
>
> -------------------
> it is not created * instantaneously*    as well
> !!   (:-)  !!
>
> noting in our universe is  done
> 'instantaneously'   !!
>
> TO   DO** ANYTHING** IS A SYNONYM OF
> TIME TAKING   !!!
>
> and there are issues of which
> it is very important to know
> how long it was done  !!!   (:-)
> the shortest   time to   do anything
> seems to   be
>  not less than the Planck   time    !!!........!!
> and it is apparently belongs to
> photon creation    ....
> ATB
> Y.Porat
> ------------------------
>
> Y.Porat
> ----------------------------

Which is faster Planck time or c?
From: Dono. on 27 May 2010 11:19
On May 27, 7:52 am, BozoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Which is faster Planck time or c?

LOL

From: GogoJF on 27 May 2010 17:14
On May 27, 10:19 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> On May 27, 7:52 am, BozoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Which is faster Planck time or c?
>
> LOL

According to Wiki on Plank time:
It is the time required for light to travel, in a vacuum, a distance
of 1 Planck length.
According to Wiki on Planck length:
Unit of length, equal to 1.616252(81)×10-35 meters.

Dono, shouldn't the answer to this question be that they are equally
as fast?
From: Sam Wormley on 27 May 2010 18:29
On 5/27/10 9:52 AM, GogoJF wrote:
> Which is faster Planck time or c?

Why are you trying compare a time interval with speed?
From: PD on 27 May 2010 18:31
On May 27, 4:14 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 27, 10:19 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On May 27, 7:52 am, BozoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Which is faster Planck time or c?
>
> > LOL
>
> According to Wiki on Plank time:
> It is the time required for light to travel, in a vacuum, a distance
> of 1 Planck length.
> According to Wiki on Planck length:
> Unit of length, equal to 1.616252(81)×10-35 meters.
>
> Dono, shouldn't the answer to this question be that they are equally
> as fast?

Which is faster, 60 miles per hour, or one hour?
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: SR is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT - Tom Roberts
Next: Minkowski Metric.