Prev: FYI: Creating circular references is a perfectly OK thing to do.
Next: Volunteers Requested for open source publishing project
From: Scott Sauyet on 30 Jul 2010 12:53 David Mark wrote: > On Jul 30, 7:42 am, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> David Mark wrote: >>> On Jul 29, 10:00 am, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> > David Mark wrote: >>>> Well. so much for your being done with this discussion, huh? :-) > >>> Ah, the indefatigable match announcer. > >> No, I just like to point out inconsistencies and other intellectual >> dishonesties. > > An irritating pundit, basically. And the use of the term > "intellectual dishonesties" in this context (or in Usenet in general) > is beyond laughable. Do you read your stuff before you post? Try it > in front of a mirror. ;) *PLONK* -- Scott
From: David Mark on 30 Jul 2010 16:15
On Jul 30, 12:53 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > David Mark wrote: > > On Jul 30, 7:42 am, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> David Mark wrote: > >>> On Jul 29, 10:00 am, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > David Mark wrote: > >>>> Well. so much for your being done with this discussion, huh? :-) > > >>> Ah, the indefatigable match announcer. > > >> No, I just like to point out inconsistencies and other intellectual > >> dishonesties. > > > An irritating pundit, basically. And the use of the term > > "intellectual dishonesties" in this context (or in Usenet in general) > > is beyond laughable. Do you read your stuff before you post? Try it > > in front of a mirror. ;) > > *PLONK* > That's the best news I've heard all day. It's not like you respond often, but it's virtually always irritating and pointless. |